Justice Department Seeks to Invalidate Vermont Climate Law
The Justice Department has filed a motion in federal court seeking to invalidate a Vermont law that holds major polluters financially responsible for climate damages, arguing the policy is unlawful on its face.
In a brief filed Monday in a Burlington federal court, the administration asked the judge to shut down the state's Climate Superfund Act, which was passed in 2024. The law requires major polluters to pay for their carbon emissions, which have warmed the planet and increased the intensity of extreme weather events.
The Justice Department claims the policy is unconstitutional and unenforceable under the federal Superfund Act. "The Court should deny the motions to dismiss, grant the United States motion for summary judgment, declare the Superfund Act unconstitutional and unenforceable, and permanently enjoin Defendants from taking any actions to implement or enforce it," wrote Riley Walters, counsel to an acting assistant attorney general.
Supporters of the law argue that it is a crucial step in addressing climate change. "This law holds polluters accountable for their role in causing climate harm, which is essential for protecting our communities and environment," said Sarah Hoffman, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group (VPIRG).
The Justice Department's move has been met with criticism from environmental groups. "It's disappointing but not surprising that the Trump administration would try to undermine a state's efforts to address climate change," said May Boeve, executive director of 350.org.
Background on the law shows it was passed in response to growing concerns about climate change and its impact on Vermont communities. The state has been at the forefront of addressing climate issues, with several initiatives aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting renewable energy.
The current status of the case is that the Justice Department's motion is pending before a federal judge. A decision on the matter is expected in the coming weeks. If the court grants the motion, it would effectively invalidate the Vermont law, leaving major polluters without financial responsibility for their carbon emissions.
In related news, several other states have introduced similar legislation aimed at holding polluters accountable for climate damages. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for these efforts and the broader fight against climate change.
*Reporting by Motherjones.*
