DHS Detains Green Card Holder with Brain Tumor Over Alleged Forgery Without Evidence

Deportation of Brain Tumor Patient Raises Questions About DHS Research A 65-year-old Indian national with a green card and a rapidly advancing brain tumor has been detained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for almost two months, sparking concerns about the accuracy of government research. Paramjit Singh, who arrived in the United States over 30 years ago to build a family and business empire, is now facing deportation despite his lawyer's claims that DHS misclassified him as subject to removal. According to court documents, DHS cited a 25-year-old theft conviction as grounds for deportation, but an immigration judge later found that Singh had served his time. However, the government then pointed to a forgery case that appears to be non-existent, raising questions about the thoroughness of their research. Singh's niece, Kirandeep Kaur, told The Intercept that her uncle is struggling to cope with the stress of detention and the advancing brain tumor, which has left him going blind. "He says he thinks he's just going to give up," Kaur said. "I think he's lost over 20 pounds since he's been in there." Singh's lawyer argues that DHS's research is sloppy and relies on outdated information. "The government's case against Mr. Singh is built on a foundation of sand," the lawyer said. "They've misclassified him, they've dug up an old conviction that has no bearing on his current status, and now they're trying to deport him based on a non-existent forgery charge." Background research reveals that DHS has been criticized in the past for its handling of immigration cases, with some advocates accusing the agency of relying too heavily on outdated databases and incomplete records. The use of AI-powered tools in immigration enforcement has also raised concerns about bias and accuracy. In response to questions from The Intercept, a DHS spokesperson said that the agency "takes all allegations of misconduct seriously" but declined to comment further on Singh's case. The implications of this case extend beyond Singh's individual situation, highlighting broader concerns about the use of AI in immigration enforcement. As AI-powered tools become increasingly prevalent in government agencies, there is growing concern about their potential for bias and error. Singh's current status remains uncertain, with his lawyer working to appeal the deportation order. The family has launched a fundraising campaign to cover medical expenses, which have skyrocketed since Singh's detention. Additional Perspectives Immigration advocates are calling on DHS to review its research methods and ensure that they are accurate and up-to-date. "This case is a stark reminder of the need for transparency and accountability in immigration enforcement," said one advocate. "We urge DHS to take a closer look at their processes and make sure that they're not relying on outdated or incomplete information." Current Status Singh remains detained at a county jail in Kentucky, where he continues to receive medical treatment but faces an uncertain future. His lawyer is working to appeal the deportation order, while the family continues to raise funds for medical expenses. Next Developments The case of Paramjit Singh has sparked renewed calls for reform in immigration enforcement, with advocates pushing for greater transparency and accountability. As AI-powered tools become increasingly prevalent in government agencies, there will be growing pressure on policymakers to address concerns about bias and accuracy. *Reporting by Theintercept.*