South Sudan Court Upholds Jurisdiction Over Riek Machar's Murder and Treason Trial

South Sudan Court Rejects Riek Machar's Bid to Halt Murder and Treason Trial A South Sudan court has ruled that it has the jurisdiction to prosecute suspended Vice-President Riek Machar and seven co-accused on charges of murder, treason, and crimes against humanity. The decision was made after Machar's legal team raised objections regarding the court's authority, constitutionality of the proceedings, and claim of immunity from prosecution. Timeline: March: A militia allegedly linked to Machar attacked a military base, killing 250 soldiers and a general. Two weeks ago: Machar was charged with murder, treason, and crimes against humanity. Present day: Machar has been under house arrest since the attack. Immediate Impact: The court's decision has raised fears of return to civil war in South Sudan. The charges have sparked concerns among international observers, who had hoped that the 2018 Peace Agreement would bring an end to the five-year conflict between Machar's forces and those loyal to President Salva Kiir. Background Context: The 2018 Peace Agreement aimed to establish a hybrid court under the African Union to try war crimes. However, the South Sudan government has argued that it can handle the trial domestically. The case highlights the challenges of implementing transitional justice in post-conflict countries. What Happens Next: The trial will continue on Wednesday, with Machar's defence team expected to present their arguments against the charges. The court's decision is a significant development in South Sudan's fragile peace process and raises questions about the effectiveness of transitional justice mechanisms in the country. *This story is developing. Information compiled from Bbc reporting.*