Trump's Land Grab: A Provision Hidden in Plain Sight Sparks Widespread Backlash

Public Lands Privatization Efforts Face Backlash A provision mandating the sale of federal land was slipped into President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill in June 2025, sparking widespread outrage among environmentalists, outdoor enthusiasts, and tribal nations. The bill passed, but selling public lands did not proceed due to a fierce public outcry. The coalition opposing privatization efforts included horseback riders, ATVers, backpackers, birdwatchers, hunters, anglers, and tribal nations, as well as podcaster Joe Rogan. "The ones that want to see this sold only have to win once," said Land Tawney, co-chair of American Hunters and Anglers. "And those of us that want to keep public lands public have to win every time." Support for preserving public lands is not limited to environmental groups. A broad coalition has formed, with some unexpected allies joining the cause. "We're seeing a lot of people who don't typically identify as environmentalists coming out in support of public land preservation," said Sarah Hillman, executive director of the New Mexico Wilderness Alliance. The push for privatization is driven by a desire to unlock economic potential on these lands. However, critics argue that this approach would have far-reaching consequences, including loss of access for recreational users and potential environmental degradation. In June 2025, hundreds of people gathered in Santa Fe, New Mexico, to protest the effort to sell off federal land. The event was a testament to the strength of public opposition to privatization efforts. The current status of the provision is unclear, but it is likely that lawmakers will revisit the issue in the coming months. As the debate continues, one thing is certain: the fate of America's public lands hangs in the balance. Background and Context Public lands are managed by the federal government, comprising approximately 640 million acres across the country. These lands provide a range of benefits, including recreational opportunities, habitat for wildlife, and economic stimulus through tourism and resource extraction. The push to privatize these lands has been ongoing for several years, with proponents arguing that it would unlock economic potential and reduce the burden on taxpayers. However, opponents argue that this approach would have far-reaching consequences, including loss of access for recreational users and potential environmental degradation. Additional Perspectives While some lawmakers continue to advocate for privatization, others are pushing back against the effort. "We're not going to let a small group of special interests dictate our public lands policy," said Senator Martin Heinrich (D-NM). "We need to prioritize the needs of all Americans, not just those who stand to gain from privatization." As the debate continues, one thing is certain: the fate of America's public lands hangs in the balance. The outcome will depend on the strength of public opposition and the willingness of lawmakers to listen to their constituents. Current Status and Next Developments The current status of the provision is unclear, but it is likely that lawmakers will revisit the issue in the coming months. As the debate continues, one thing is certain: the fate of America's public lands hangs in the balance. *Reporting by Motherjones.*