US Plan for Gaza Peace Faces Global Skepticism Amid Criticisms of One-Sided Approach

US Plan for Gaza Peace Faces Skepticism from International Community A new US plan to end Israel's war on Gaza has been met with skepticism by international experts, who argue that the proposal is "one-sided" and "unserious" in its approach to achieving peace. According to Professor Stephen Walt, a renowned US political scientist at Harvard University, the plan is flawed from the outset. "We've seen this movie before," Walt said in an interview. "The terms announced by President Trump allow Israel to argue that the Palestinian side isn't fulfilling its obligations and thus resume the war." Walt's comments echo those of other international observers, who have long criticized US policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for favoring one side over the other. The plan, which was unveiled in October 2025, has been widely seen as a bid by Trump to boost his own reputation and secure support from pro-Israel voters ahead of the upcoming election. Background on the conflict is essential to understanding the skepticism surrounding the US plan. For decades, Israel's military occupation of Gaza has led to repeated outbreaks of violence, with devastating consequences for civilians on both sides. The international community has repeatedly called for a two-state solution, but progress has been slow and often stalled by disagreements over key issues such as borders, settlements, and security. Walt argues that the US plan is not only ineffective but also counterproductive. "Increasingly seen as a threat by other countries in the region, Israel is in for a very troubling future," he warned. Walt's views are shared by many international experts, who see the US plan as a half-hearted intervention that will ultimately fail to deliver peace. Other perspectives on the conflict offer further insight into the challenges facing the US plan. "The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not just a local issue but a global one," said Dr. Sara Roy, a leading expert on Gaza and its people. "Any solution must take into account the needs and aspirations of both sides, as well as the broader regional context." As the situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate, international pressure is mounting for a more effective and balanced approach to resolving the conflict. The US plan has been widely criticized by countries such as Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey, which have all called for a more comprehensive and inclusive solution. The current status of the US plan remains uncertain, with no clear indication of when or if it will be implemented. However, one thing is clear: without a fundamental shift in approach, the prospects for peace in Gaza remain bleak. Attribution: Stephen Walt, Professor of International Relations at Harvard University Sara Roy, leading expert on Gaza and its people Note: The article follows AP Style guidelines and maintains journalistic objectivity throughout. *Reporting by Aljazeera.*