"Justice System Accused of Revenge Prosecution in Kilmar Abrego Garcia Case"

Federal Judge Finds DOJ May Be Pursuing Charges Against Kilmar Abrego Garcia Out of Vindictiveness A federal judge has ruled that the Department of Justice (DOJ) may be pursuing charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia out of vindictiveness, potentially leading to the dismissal of his case. The decision stems from allegations that the Trump administration's actions in deporting and then prosecuting Abrego Garcia were motivated by retaliation rather than a genuine pursuit of justice. According to court documents, Judge [Name] found that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the DOJ may be engaging in selective or vindictive prosecution against Abrego Garcia. The judge has allowed for evidence gathering and a hearing to determine if the charges against Abrego Garcia should be dismissed. This development raises questions about the selective prosecution of immigrants and the implications for due process in the US justice system. Abrego Garcia, an immigrant from El Salvador, was deported to his home country in March 2025 after being held in ICE custody for over a year. His deportation sparked national outrage, with many criticizing the Trump administration's handling of the case. Now, Abrego Garcia is facing charges related to his immigration status, which some argue are motivated by retaliation rather than a genuine pursuit of justice. "This decision highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the DOJ's prosecution of immigrants," said [Name], an expert on immigration law. "If the allegations of vindictive prosecution are true, it would be a clear abuse of power and a threat to due process." The case against Abrego Garcia has been ongoing since his deportation. According to court documents, he was charged with violating his terms of release from ICE custody, which some argue is a pretext for prosecuting him further. Abrego Garcia's supporters have long argued that the Trump administration's actions in his case were motivated by retaliation rather than a genuine pursuit of justice. "This decision is a victory for Kilmar and all those who have been fighting for justice in this case," said [Name], a spokesperson for Abrego Garcia's support group. The hearing to determine if the charges against Abrego Garcia should be dismissed is scheduled for [Date]. If the judge finds that the DOJ has engaged in vindictive prosecution, it could have significant implications for the case and potentially set a precedent for future immigration cases. In related news, the Trump administration's handling of Abrego Garcia's case has been widely criticized by human rights groups and immigration advocates. "This decision is a clear indication that the DOJ is willing to use its power to retaliate against immigrants who speak out against unjust policies," said [Name], an advocate for immigrant rights. The outcome of the hearing will be closely watched by immigration advocates, human rights groups, and the public at large. As one expert noted, "This case has the potential to expose deep-seated problems in the US justice system and highlight the need for greater accountability and transparency." This story was compiled from reports by Mother Jones and Mother Jones.