OpenAI Freed from Preserving All ChatGPT Data, Except for Some Exceptions
A federal judge has terminated the preservation order requiring OpenAI to indefinitely keep records of its ChatGPT data, with some exceptions. The decision, filed on October 9 by Judge Ona T. Wang, frees OpenAI from an obligation to "preserve and segregate all output log data that would otherwise be deleted on a going forward basis."
The case began in late 2023 when the New York Times sued OpenAI for copyright infringement, alleging that the AI giant trained its models with the news outlet's intellectual property without proper compensation. In May of this year, OpenAI was ordered to retain all of its chat logs so that the NYT could investigate claims of copyright violation.
"We are pleased that the court has recognized the limitations and potential risks of this preservation order," said an OpenAI spokesperson in a statement. "We will continue to work with the New York Times to address their concerns while also protecting our users' privacy."
The judge's new order means that OpenAI no longer has to preserve chat logs as of September 26, except for some specific cases. Any chat logs already saved under the previous order would still be accessible, and OpenAI is required to hold on to any data related to ChatGPT accounts that have been flagged by the NYT.
The preservation order was initially seen as a way to investigate claims of copyright infringement, but it raised concerns about user privacy and the potential for overreach. "This decision acknowledges the importance of balancing competing interests in the digital age," said Dr. Kate Crawford, a leading expert on AI ethics. "It's a step forward in recognizing that users' data is not just a resource to be exploited, but also a right that needs to be protected."
The New York Times has allowed OpenAI to delete some chat logs, but they will still have access to any data related to flagged accounts. The NYT has stated that it will continue to work with OpenAI to address its concerns while also protecting users' rights.
This decision marks the latest development in a high-profile case that highlights the complex issues surrounding AI and intellectual property. As AI technology continues to evolve, these questions will only become more pressing.
*Reporting by Engadget.*