Supreme Court Weighs Fate of Trump Tariffs in High-Stakes Hearing
Multi-Source Journalism
This article synthesizes reporting from multiple credible news sources to provide comprehensive, balanced coverage.
Multi-Source Journalism
This article synthesizes reporting from multiple credible news sources to provide comprehensive, balanced coverage.
Join 0 others in the conversation
Your voice matters in this discussion
Be the first to share your thoughts and engage with this article. Your perspective matters!
Discover more articles
A US appeals court has dealt a significant blow to former President Donald Trump's foreign policy agenda, ruling that most of his global tariffs are illegal. The 7-4 decision, which affects tariffs imposed on countries including China, Mexico, and Ca
Mark SchiefelbeinAP Get your news from a source thats not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.
In a landmark Supreme Court case, the authority of President Trump to impose tariffs under emergency powers is being challenged, potentially impacting up to $100 billion in trade and testing the Constitution's grant of trade powers to Congress. The c
In a significant blow to former US President Donald Trump's trade policies, a US appeals court has struck down the majority of his global tariffs, deeming them illegal and outside the scope of his emergency economic powers. The ruling, which affects
The US Supreme Court has agreed to review President Trump's tariffs, which have been deemed illegal by two lower courts for bypassing congressional authority. The court's decision comes as the government estimates it has collected nearly $1 trillion
In a landmark ruling, a US appeals court has struck down most of President Donald Trump's global tariffs, deeming them "invalid as contrary to law" and potentially upending his foreign policy agenda. The decision affects tariffs imposed on numerous c
A US-India trade deal is underway, but the uncertainty surrounding President Trump's tariffs has already taken a toll on Indian export hubs, resulting in cancelled orders, layoffs, and reduced wages for factory workers. This economic instability high
President Trump's tariffs, imposed at the highest levels since the Great Depression, have generated tens of billions of dollars in revenue for the US government, but at a steep economic cost, including higher prices for consumers and significant loss
Mark SchiefelbeinAP Get your news from a source thats not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.
In a closely watched Supreme Court hearing, justices from both conservative and liberal sides expressed skepticism over the Trump administration's argument that President Trump can impose tariffs on other countries without Congressional approval, cit
The US Supreme Court has agreed to review President Trump's use of emergency powers to impose tariffs on various countries, following lower court rulings that some of these tariffs were unlawful. The high court will examine whether Trump acted within
Global trade experts predict a Supreme Court ruling against President Trump's broad tariffs, with odds ranging from 70-80%, citing potential opposition from even conservative justices. The decision is expected by year-end and may defy traditional ide
MoneyPersonal FinanceUS Appeals Court Finds President Trumps Tariffs IllegalByErik Sherman,Senior Contributor.Forbes contributors publish independent expert analyses and insights. Erik Sherman reports on business, economics, finance, tech, and law.Fo
A recent tariffs case is set to serve as a test of the Supreme Court's commitment to limiting executive power, a principle that Republican justices previously championed when President Biden was in office. The case involves President Trump's tariffs,
The US Supreme Court has agreed to review the legality of President Trump's tariffs imposed in April 2023, which have generated nearly $1 trillion in revenue for the government. The case marks a significant challenge to the president's executive auth
American businesses, including Stamford-based Lovesac, are eyeing potential tariff refunds totaling $1 trillion, pending a Supreme Court decision that could significantly impact the country's trade landscape. The refunds stem from a long-standing tra
Mark SchiefelbeinAP Get your news from a source thats not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.
The US Supreme Court is deliberating on a landmark case challenging President Trump's authority to impose sweeping global tariffs without Congressional approval. Key conservative justices expressed skepticism during oral arguments, potentially jeopar
In a closely watched Supreme Court hearing, justices from both conservative and liberal sides expressed skepticism over the Trump administration's argument that President Trump can impose tariffs on other countries without Congressional approval, cit
US President Trump has called on the Republican Party to end the 37-day government shutdown, citing the party's losses in Tuesday's elections, while also acknowledging the shutdown's negative impact on his own party. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has
US Supreme Court justices are scrutinizing the legality of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, with the administration seeking a swift ruling on the matter. The justices are questioning whether Trump overstepped his authority by imposing tarif
A US federal appeals court has ruled that most of Donald Trump's tariffs imposed on nearly every country the US trades with are an overreach of his emergency powers as president, deeming them illegal. The tariffs, which were meant to even out "unfair
A landmark US Supreme Court case is set to decide the fate of President Donald Trump's reliance on tariffs as a key tool of foreign policy, with far-reaching implications for executive power and global trade. The case, which pits Trump's emergency po
A landmark Supreme Court case this week will determine the fate of President Trump's tariffs, with the government arguing that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act grants the President broad authority to impose trade restrictions. The case
Share & Engage Share
Share this article