UK Judge Sets Precedent: Online Shopping at Work No Longer a Firing Offense

Breaking News: Online Shopping at Work Not a Sackable Offence, UK Judge Rules A significant ruling has been made in the UK regarding online shopping at work, with a judge declaring that spending less than an hour browsing personal sites during work hours is not grounds for dismissal. Employment Tribunal Judge Michael Magee ruled in favor of Ms A Lanuszka, an accountancy administrator who was fired from her job in July 2023. Key Facts and Timeline Ms Lanuszka was employed by Accountancy MK since 2017 but signed a new contract in September 2021. She was dismissed after her employer used spy software to track her computer activity, revealing she had been browsing personal sites during work hours. The tribunal ruled that Ms Lanuszka's dismissal was unfair and coincided with the permanent move of the business owner's sister to the UK. Immediate Impact and Response The ruling has significant implications for employers in the UK, as it sets a precedent for what constitutes "excessive" use of company resources. Employers will need to reassess their policies on personal use of work computers and devices. Ms Lanuszka has been awarded over £14,000 in compensation. Background Context The case highlights the increasing use of technology to monitor employee activity and the potential consequences for employers who misuse this data. The ruling also underscores the importance of fair dismissal procedures and the need for employers to demonstrate a clear reason for terminating an employee's contract. What Happens Next This landmark ruling is likely to spark debate among employers, employees, and employment lawyers. As more cases like Ms Lanuszka's come to light, it will be interesting to see how employers adapt their policies on personal use of company resources. The UK government may also consider revising its laws on unfair dismissal in response to this decision. *This story is developing. Information compiled from Bbc reporting.*