A federal appeals court has handed former President Donald Trump a significant victory, ruling that his firings of two independent agency heads were lawful. The decision, made by a 2-to-1 panel of judges at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, comes as the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in a similar case on Monday.
The firings in question occurred early this year, when Trump dismissed Cathy Harris, a Democratic member of the Merit Systems Protection Board, and Gwynne Wilcox, a Democratic member of the National Labor Relations Board. Trump took office just weeks prior and did not provide a permissible reason for the dismissals, such as neglect of duty or malfeasance in office. The appeals court's ruling suggests that the firings were lawful due to the significant executive power wielded by the two agencies.
The immediate impact of this decision is significant, as it sets a precedent for the treatment of independent agency heads. The ruling could embolden future administrations to take similar actions, potentially undermining the independence of these agencies. The decision has already sparked a response from the National Labor Relations Board, which has expressed concern over the implications of the ruling.
In a brief background, the Merit Systems Protection Board and the National Labor Relations Board are independent agencies responsible for protecting federal employees and enforcing labor laws, respectively. These agencies are designed to operate independently of the executive branch, with their members serving fixed terms to prevent political interference.
The Supreme Court's upcoming hearing on a similar case will now take on added significance, as the appeals court's decision sets the stage for a potentially landmark ruling on the limits of executive power. The court will hear arguments on Monday, and a decision is expected in the coming months.
Share & Engage Share
Share this article