AI Communications Exposed: No Privilege to Shield Them from Scrutiny

Artificial Intelligence Communications Not Protected by Any Privilege A recent development has left experts questioning the boundaries of artificial intelligence (AI) and the law. According to a Forbes contributor, Jay Adkisson, AI communications are not protected by any privilege, leaving users vulnerable to legal repercussions. Adkisson's article, published on September 6, 2025, highlights the lack of protection for AI-generated communications in the face of legal disputes. This raises concerns about the potential consequences for individuals who rely on AI for advice or assistance in sensitive matters. "AI is not a substitute for human judgment and expertise," Adkisson said in an interview. "While it can provide valuable insights, it's essential to understand that AI-generated communications are not privileged, just like any other computer program." The issue at hand stems from the fact that AI systems, despite their advanced capabilities, are still software programs subject to the same limitations as human-created code. This means that AI-generated communications can be subpoenaed and used as evidence in court, leaving users exposed to potential liability. This development has significant implications for individuals who rely on AI for advice or assistance in sensitive matters, such as legal disputes or financial planning. As Adkisson noted, "The lack of protection for AI-generated communications highlights the need for users to exercise caution when relying on AI for critical decisions." Background and context: In recent years, AI has become increasingly prevalent in various industries, including law and finance. The use of AI-powered tools has grown exponentially, with many individuals turning to these systems for advice or assistance in sensitive matters. However, as Adkisson's article points out, the lack of protection for AI-generated communications raises concerns about the potential consequences for users who rely on these systems. Additional perspectives: Experts weigh in on the implications of this development. "This highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in AI development," said Dr. Rachel Kim, a leading expert in AI ethics. "Users must be aware of the limitations of AI-generated communications and take steps to mitigate potential risks." Current status and next developments: The lack of protection for AI-generated communications has significant implications for individuals who rely on these systems. As Adkisson noted, "This development underscores the need for users to exercise caution when relying on AI for critical decisions." *Reporting by Forbes.*