DNA Evidence Links Man to 2008 Rape, but Massachusetts Law Runs Out of Time

DNA Evidence Tied a Man to Her Rape, but Massachusetts Law Was Too Late In a case that highlights the complexities of the state's statute of limitations on rape prosecutions, DNA evidence linked a man to a Boston-area woman's rape in 2008. However, due to Massachusetts' strict 15-year deadline for prosecuting such crimes, the victim was unable to face her attacker in court. According to police reports and court documents, the victim reported being raped by an acquaintance at his home in 2008. DNA evidence collected from the scene matched a suspect, but by the time investigators had gathered enough evidence to pursue charges, the statute of limitations had expired. "It's frustrating for us as law enforcement," said Boston Police Commissioner William Gross. "We've got a victim who has come forward and given us information that could lead to an arrest and prosecution, but our hands are tied." Under Massachusetts law, which is one of the shortest deadlines in the country for prosecuting rape, no DNA match, testimony, or even confession can give a rape victim a chance of facing their attacker in court after 15 years. This has led some advocates to call for changes to the statute of limitations. "It's a national outlier," said Rachel Lovell, executive director of the Massachusetts Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence. "Most states allow at least some old rape cases to be prosecuted. It's time for Massachusetts to catch up with the rest of the country." Attempts to lengthen the statute of limitations in Massachusetts have failed every year since 2011. Supporters of changing the law argue that it would give victims a chance to seek justice, even if it takes years or decades. "We understand that this is a difficult issue," said State Representative Claire Cronin, who has sponsored legislation to extend the statute of limitations on rape prosecutions. "But we believe that it's essential for victims to have the opportunity to pursue their cases in court." The case highlights the impact of the state's strict deadline on victims and law enforcement alike. While some advocates are pushing for changes to the law, others argue that it is necessary to protect defendants' rights. "It's a balance between the victim's right to seek justice and the defendant's right to due process," said State Representative James Lyons, who has opposed efforts to extend the statute of limitations. "We need to be careful not to rush into changes without considering all the implications." The case remains closed, with no charges filed against the suspect. The victim's identity is protected under Massachusetts law, which keeps police reports of rape cases secret. As the debate over changing the statute of limitations continues, advocates for victims' rights are calling on lawmakers to take action. "It's time for Massachusetts to join the rest of the country in giving victims a chance to seek justice," said Lovell. *Reporting by Propublica.*