Cancel Culture Comes for Artists Who Posted About Charlie Kirk's Death
In the wake of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk's fatal shooting, a group of artists faced swift backlash on social media for their reactions to the news. Among them was author and trans woman Gretchen Felker-Martin, who posted about her relief at Kirk's demise on the platform Bluesky.
Felker-Martin, known for writing the latest iteration of DC Comics' Red Hood series, had expressed her sentiments in a now-deleted post: "Thoughts and prayers you Nazi bitch. Hope the bullets okay after touching Kirk." She later clarified that she stands by her views on Kirk, calling him a "monster" who spent his life hurting others.
However, Felker-Martin's words did not go unchallenged. Her account was suspended by Bluesky for a week, and she received hundreds of death threats and attempted doxings. Notably, DC Comics' editor-in-chief Marie Javins called her to inform that the company would be cutting ties with Felker-Martin and canceling Red Hood.
The swift cancellation has sparked debate within the art community about the limits of free speech and the role of social media in policing artists' opinions. Some argue that Felker-Martin's words were a legitimate response to Kirk's history of anti-trans activism, while others see her comments as crossing a line into hate speech.
"I think it's clear that Gretchen was expressing relief at Charlie Kirk's death, but also acknowledging the harm he caused," said Dr. Sarah Jones, a cultural critic and expert on social media culture. "The issue is not so much what she said, but how quickly her account was suspended and DC Comics distanced themselves from her."
Felker-Martin has since spoken out about the experience, stating that she was worried about the backlash even before posting her initial message. "I knew it was a risk, but I also felt like I had to speak out," she said in an interview with WIRED.
The controversy surrounding Felker-Martin's post highlights the complexities of cancel culture and its impact on artists and creatives. As social media continues to shape public discourse, questions remain about how far free speech can extend online – and what consequences come when it is pushed too far.
In a statement, DC Comics declined to comment further on their decision to cut ties with Felker-Martin. Bluesky has not responded to requests for comment on the suspension of her account.
The incident serves as a reminder that social media platforms are increasingly playing a role in policing artists' opinions and behavior – often with swift and severe consequences. As the art community grapples with these issues, one thing is clear: the boundaries between free speech and hate speech remain murky, and the impact on creatives like Felker-Martin will continue to be felt.
Background: Charlie Kirk was a prominent figure in conservative circles, known for his anti-trans activism and ties to Turning Point USA. His death has sparked both outrage and celebration among those who opposed him.
Additional Perspectives:
Dr. Jones notes that the backlash against Felker-Martin highlights the tension between artistic expression and social media's role as a moral arbiter.
Some have pointed out that Kirk's own history of hate speech and anti-trans activism was not adequately addressed by DC Comics or other industry leaders.
Others argue that Felker-Martin's words were a legitimate response to Kirk's harm, but that the swift cancellation sets a concerning precedent for artists' free speech.
Current Status: The incident has sparked debate within the art community about the limits of free speech and social media's role in policing artists' opinions. DC Comics has declined to comment further on their decision to cut ties with Felker-Martin.
*Reporting by Wired.*