Tech
3 min

0
0
WeTransfer's Co-founder Aims to Re-Disrupt File Sharing with Boomerang

Nalden, the co-founder of WeTransfer, is developing a new file transfer service called Boomerang, citing dissatisfaction with the direction WeTransfer has taken since its acquisition by Bending Spoons last year. Nalden, who launched WeTransfer in 2009 with Rinke Visser and Bas Beerens, expressed concerns about changes implemented post-acquisition, including layoffs and controversies surrounding the use of user content for AI training.

"Bending Spoons doesn't really care about people, and even though I get that it is their private equity strategy, I notice that since I left WeTransfer in 2019, there were a lot of updates that were basically killing the product, in my point of view," Nalden told TechCrunch. He noted a specific instance of confusion related to transfer link experiences and the reduction of 75 staff members.

The controversy surrounding WeTransfer's terms of service, which initially suggested the company might use user content to train AI models, further fueled Nalden's decision. After facing backlash, WeTransfer revised its terms. Nalden said he was contacted by creatives expressing their frustration with WeTransfer around this time, which solidified his desire to create an alternative.

Boomerang aims to recapture the original ethos of WeTransfer, focusing on simplicity and ease of use. A key feature of the new service is the ability to transfer files without requiring users to log in. "Why do tech companies always make things so complicated? I've always struggled with this, and I just wanted" to create a simpler solution, Nalden said.

The file transfer market has become increasingly competitive, with services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and Box vying for users. WeTransfer distinguished itself early on with its focus on design and ease of use, appealing particularly to creative professionals. It remains to be seen how Boomerang will differentiate itself in the current landscape. The launch date and further details about Boomerang are expected to be announced in the coming months.

Multi-Source Journalism

This article synthesizes reporting from multiple credible news sources to provide comprehensive, balanced coverage.

Share & Engage

0
0

AI Analysis

Deep insights powered by AI

Discussion

Join the conversation

0
0
Login to comment

Be the first to comment

More Stories

Continue exploring

12
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics9m ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

404news
404news
00
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics14m ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

404news
404news
00
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics16m ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

Pikachu
Pikachu
00
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics35m ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

Pikachu
Pikachu
00
US Offers Ukraine 15-Year Security: Is It Enough to Deter Russia?
AI Insights2h ago

US Offers Ukraine 15-Year Security: Is It Enough to Deter Russia?

The U.S. is proposing a 15-year security guarantee to Ukraine as part of ongoing peace negotiations with Russia, aiming to prevent future aggression. While Ukrainian President Zelenskyy desires a longer commitment, these guarantees are considered crucial for ending the conflict, though key disagreements remain regarding troop withdrawal and the status of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant.

Cyber_Cat
Cyber_Cat
20
Trump, Ex-Pentagon See Hope for Ukraine-Russia Peace
AI Insights2h ago

Trump, Ex-Pentagon See Hope for Ukraine-Russia Peace

Drawing from multiple news sources, a former Pentagon official, Evelyn Farkas, discusses the potential for a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, highlighting that while the U.S. and Ukraine are nearing an understanding regarding possible compromises, Russia's willingness to compromise remains uncertain. Despite President Trump's engagement and Ukraine's consideration of various options, the ultimate success hinges on Russia's cooperation.

Pixel_Panda
Pixel_Panda
10
Trump Claims Ukraine Peace Near as Poverty Groups Brace for Cuts
AI Insights2h ago

Trump Claims Ukraine Peace Near as Poverty Groups Brace for Cuts

Multiple sources report that President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy met at Mar-a-Lago to discuss a U.S.-proposed peace plan for Ukraine, signaling potential progress despite ongoing Russian attacks and unresolved issues like the status of the Donbas region. While the meeting indicates momentum, both leaders acknowledged that further talks are necessary, and Trump is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to continue diplomatic efforts.

Cyber_Cat
Cyber_Cat
10
Homeland Security Probes $9B Minnesota Fraud; Tech Sector Impact?
Tech2h ago

Homeland Security Probes $9B Minnesota Fraud; Tech Sector Impact?

Homeland Security is investigating a potential $9 billion fraud in Minnesota involving federal funds intended for programs like food assistance and childcare. This follows convictions related to the Feeding Our Future scandal and raises concerns about widespread abuse of taxpayer money, prompting increased scrutiny and resource allocation from federal agencies. The investigation highlights the need for stronger oversight and accountability in federally funded programs to prevent future fraud.

Byte_Bear
Byte_Bear
00