Since Australia this month barred children under 16 from using social media, parents around the world have been engaged in discussions about the potential need for similar measures in their own countries. These conversations are taking place at school drop-offs, playgrounds, group chats, and online forums, reflecting a growing concern about the impact of social media on young people.

The Australian ban has sparked a global debate, with several countries now considering adopting similar legislation. Malaysia, for example, has announced plans to bar children under 16 from social media platforms starting in 2026. Denmark is also contemplating stringent restrictions that could become the toughest in Europe.

The impetus behind these discussions stems from a widespread anxiety among parents regarding their children's exposure to social media. A frustrated father in Spain, whose teenage daughter routinely circumvents parental controls on apps like TikTok and Instagram, expressed a desire for a government ban on these platforms for children.

However, opinions on government intervention are divided. In France, a mother of three voiced her concerns about social media's influence on young people, stating she will not provide her children with smartphones until they reach 15. Despite her worries, she remains skeptical about the effectiveness of a government prohibition.

A mother in Chile offered a contrasting viewpoint, arguing that teaching children responsible social media usage is the responsibility of parents, not the government. This perspective highlights a broader debate about the appropriate balance between parental guidance and government regulation in the digital age.

In Australia, surveys indicate that the majority of parents support the new rules. However, reports have emerged of teenagers utilizing VPNs and other methods to bypass the ban, raising questions about its long-term effectiveness. The situation underscores the challenges of enforcing such restrictions in a technologically savvy world.