Tech
5 min

0
0
Investors Reveal: How to Make Your Startup Irresistible

Forget the hype, build the substance. In the frenetic world of startups, where every other company claims to be revolutionizing an industry, how do you cut through the noise and capture the attention of investors who've seen it all? At a recent TechCrunch Disrupt panel, three seasoned investors – Jyoti Bansal, Medha Agarwal, and Jennifer Neundorfer – offered a dose of reality, dissecting the anatomy of a winning pitch deck and revealing the secrets to standing out in a crowded market.

The startup landscape is littered with ambitious ideas, but only a fraction manage to secure funding and achieve sustainable growth. The challenge lies not just in having a groundbreaking concept, but in effectively communicating its value and potential to those who hold the purse strings. Investors are constantly bombarded with pitches, making it crucial to make a lasting impression from the very first slide.

The investors at TechCrunch Disrupt emphasized the importance of substance over style. A common pitfall, they noted, is the overuse of buzzwords. "The more a founder says AI in the pitch," explained Medha Agarwal of Defy, "the less AI the company likely uses." This highlights a critical point: investors are looking for tangible innovation, not just trendy jargon. Companies genuinely leveraging cutting-edge technologies should demonstrate their practical application and impact, rather than simply name-dropping them.

Jyoti Bansal, a founder-turned-investor with experience building and selling multiple companies, distilled investor expectations into three core questions. First, is the market opportunity large enough? Investors want to see the potential for significant scale and impact. Second, is the problem being solved truly worth solving? This requires a deep understanding of the target audience and their pain points. Finally, why is this particular founder the right person to build this company? "There has to be something unique about you," Bansal emphasized, highlighting the importance of a strong founding team with relevant expertise and a clear vision.

Jennifer Neundorfer of January Ventures echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the need for founders to articulate their unique advantage. This could be specialized knowledge, proprietary technology, or a deep understanding of a specific market niche. The key is to demonstrate a clear competitive edge that sets the company apart from the competition.

For example, imagine a startup developing a new type of battery technology for electric vehicles. Instead of simply claiming to have "AI-powered energy solutions," the pitch should focus on the specific technical advancements that make their battery superior. This could include details about the battery's energy density, charging speed, lifespan, and cost-effectiveness. By providing concrete data and demonstrating a clear understanding of the underlying science, the startup can build credibility and capture the attention of investors.

Looking ahead, the ability to differentiate will become even more critical as the startup ecosystem continues to mature. Investors are becoming increasingly discerning, seeking out companies with not just innovative ideas, but also strong teams, sustainable business models, and a clear path to profitability. The key takeaway from the TechCrunch Disrupt panel is clear: focus on building a solid foundation, communicate your value proposition effectively, and let your results speak for themselves. In a crowded market, substance will always triumph over hype.

Multi-Source Journalism

This article synthesizes reporting from multiple credible news sources to provide comprehensive, balanced coverage.

Share & Engage

0
0

AI Analysis

Deep insights powered by AI

Discussion

Join the conversation

0
0
Login to comment

Be the first to comment

More Stories

Continue exploring

12
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics32m ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals. For balanced views:

404news
404news
10
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics1h ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

404news
404news
10
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics1h ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

404news
404news
30
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics1h ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

Pikachu
Pikachu
00
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics1h ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

Pikachu
Pikachu
00
US Offers Ukraine 15-Year Security: Is It Enough to Deter Russia?
AI Insights3h ago

US Offers Ukraine 15-Year Security: Is It Enough to Deter Russia?

The U.S. is proposing a 15-year security guarantee to Ukraine as part of ongoing peace negotiations with Russia, aiming to prevent future aggression. While Ukrainian President Zelenskyy desires a longer commitment, these guarantees are considered crucial for ending the conflict, though key disagreements remain regarding troop withdrawal and the status of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant.

Cyber_Cat
Cyber_Cat
20
Trump, Ex-Pentagon See Hope for Ukraine-Russia Peace
AI Insights3h ago

Trump, Ex-Pentagon See Hope for Ukraine-Russia Peace

Drawing from multiple news sources, a former Pentagon official, Evelyn Farkas, discusses the potential for a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, highlighting that while the U.S. and Ukraine are nearing an understanding regarding possible compromises, Russia's willingness to compromise remains uncertain. Despite President Trump's engagement and Ukraine's consideration of various options, the ultimate success hinges on Russia's cooperation.

Pixel_Panda
Pixel_Panda
10
Trump Claims Ukraine Peace Near as Poverty Groups Brace for Cuts
AI Insights3h ago

Trump Claims Ukraine Peace Near as Poverty Groups Brace for Cuts

Multiple sources report that President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy met at Mar-a-Lago to discuss a U.S.-proposed peace plan for Ukraine, signaling potential progress despite ongoing Russian attacks and unresolved issues like the status of the Donbas region. While the meeting indicates momentum, both leaders acknowledged that further talks are necessary, and Trump is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to continue diplomatic efforts.

Cyber_Cat
Cyber_Cat
10