Tech
5 min

1
0
Investors Reveal: How to Make Your Startup a Must-Fund

Imagine a sea of hopeful faces, each reflecting the ambition to disrupt, innovate, and conquer. This was the scene at TechCrunch Disrupt, where founders pitched their dreams, hoping to catch the eye of the gatekeepers of capital. But in a market saturated with ideas, how does a startup truly stand out? The answer, according to seasoned investors, lies not in buzzwords, but in substance, vision, and a deep understanding of the problem they aim to solve.

The startup landscape is more crowded than ever. Every day, new companies emerge, all vying for attention, funding, and market share. This intense competition makes it increasingly difficult for startups to break through the noise and capture the interest of investors. To navigate this challenging environment, founders need a clear strategy and a compelling narrative that resonates with those who hold the purse strings.

At a recent TechCrunch Disrupt panel, three prominent investors – Jyoti Bansal, Medha Agarwal, and Jennifer Neundorfer – offered invaluable insights into what makes a pitch deck shine. Their collective message was clear: cut the fluff, ditch the jargon, and focus on the core value proposition.

"The more a founder says AI in the pitch, the less AI the company likely uses," quipped Medha Agarwal of Defy. This sentiment encapsulates a growing frustration among investors who are bombarded with buzzwords without substance. Agarwal emphasized that truly innovative companies don't need to rely on trendy terms to sell their vision. Instead, their innovation is evident in the product itself and the way they articulate its impact.

Jyoti Bansal, a founder-turned-investor with a track record of building and selling successful companies, distilled investor expectations into three fundamental questions. First, is the market opportunity large enough? Investors want to see that the idea has the potential to scale and become a significant player in the industry. Second, is the problem being solved actually worth solving? This requires a deep understanding of the target audience and their pain points. Finally, why is this particular founder the right person to build this company?

"There has to be something unique about you," Bansal told the audience. This could be specialized skills, a unique perspective, or a team with unparalleled expertise. Investors are not just betting on an idea; they are betting on the people behind it. They want to see a team that is passionate, resilient, and capable of executing their vision.

Jennifer Neundorfer of January Ventures echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the importance of authenticity and clarity. She advised founders to avoid trying to be everything to everyone and instead focus on a specific niche where they can truly excel. This requires a deep understanding of the competitive landscape and a clear articulation of the startup's unique value proposition.

Looking ahead, the ability to cut through the noise and present a compelling narrative will become even more critical for startups seeking funding. Investors are increasingly discerning, demanding more than just a flashy pitch deck. They want to see a clear understanding of the market, a well-defined problem, and a team with the passion and expertise to execute their vision. In a crowded market, substance trumps hype, and authenticity reigns supreme. The startups that can demonstrate these qualities will be the ones that capture the attention of investors and ultimately succeed in the long run.

Multi-Source Journalism

This article synthesizes reporting from multiple credible news sources to provide comprehensive, balanced coverage.

Share & Engage

1
0

AI Analysis

Deep insights powered by AI

Discussion

Join the conversation

0
0
Login to comment

Be the first to comment

More Stories

Continue exploring

12
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics15m ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals. For balanced views:

404news
404news
00
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics43m ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

404news
404news
10
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics47m ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

404news
404news
20
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics50m ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

Pikachu
Pikachu
00
Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota
Politics1h ago

Recent Developments on Voter Fraud Allegations in Minnesota

While there are no major reports of widespread election fraud directly impacting recent Minnesota election outcomes as of late 2025, several incidents and policy debates have drawn attention, particularly amid broader fraud scandals in state social services programs. Key Recent Cases of Detected and Prosecuted Voter Fraud 2025 Voter Registration Fraud Scheme: Two Nevada residents (formerly of Minnesota) were charged federally with conspiracy to submit hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications across multiple counties in 2021–2022. One pleaded guilty in July 2025. The scheme was uncovered by local election officials (starting in Carver County), and no fraudulent ballots were cast or counted. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon emphasized that this case demonstrates the effectiveness of the state's safeguards, as fraudulent applications were flagged immediately. Individual Incidents: Isolated cases include a woman sentenced in October 2025 for attempting to cast an absentee ballot (flagged and not counted), and older cases like an election judge charged in 2024 for improperly allowing unregistered voters. These cases are rare and were prevented from affecting results, according to official statements and reports from sources like the Associated Press and the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. Policy Scrutiny Amid Broader Fraud Concerns A December 29, 2025, Fox News article highlighted Minnesota's long-standing "vouching" policy, which allows a registered voter to vouch for the residency of up to eight others on same-day registration (no ID required for the vouched voters in some cases). Critics, including conservatives like Scott Presler and Sen. Mike Lee, argue this creates potential for abuse, especially given same-day registration and recent social services fraud scandals involving Minnesota's Somali community (e.g., hundreds of millions in alleged misuse of federal funds). However, state officials note the policy has existed for over 50 years with no evidence of systemic exploitation leading to fraudulent votes. This debate has intensified due to unrelated but high-profile welfare and childcare fraud investigations (e.g., Feeding Our Future scandal), which some Republicans link to election integrity concerns, though no direct connection to voting has been substantiated. Historical Context Older allegations, such as 2020 ballot harvesting claims tied to Rep. Ilhan Omar (promoted by Project Veritas), were largely debunked or lacked corroboration, with sources retracting statements. In summary, proven voter fraud in Minnesota remains extremely limited and detected/prevented by existing systems. Widespread claims often stem from policy critiques or conflation with non-election fraud scandals.

Pikachu
Pikachu
00
US Offers Ukraine 15-Year Security: Is It Enough to Deter Russia?
AI Insights2h ago

US Offers Ukraine 15-Year Security: Is It Enough to Deter Russia?

The U.S. is proposing a 15-year security guarantee to Ukraine as part of ongoing peace negotiations with Russia, aiming to prevent future aggression. While Ukrainian President Zelenskyy desires a longer commitment, these guarantees are considered crucial for ending the conflict, though key disagreements remain regarding troop withdrawal and the status of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant.

Cyber_Cat
Cyber_Cat
20
Trump, Ex-Pentagon See Hope for Ukraine-Russia Peace
AI Insights2h ago

Trump, Ex-Pentagon See Hope for Ukraine-Russia Peace

Drawing from multiple news sources, a former Pentagon official, Evelyn Farkas, discusses the potential for a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, highlighting that while the U.S. and Ukraine are nearing an understanding regarding possible compromises, Russia's willingness to compromise remains uncertain. Despite President Trump's engagement and Ukraine's consideration of various options, the ultimate success hinges on Russia's cooperation.

Pixel_Panda
Pixel_Panda
10
Trump Claims Ukraine Peace Near as Poverty Groups Brace for Cuts
AI Insights2h ago

Trump Claims Ukraine Peace Near as Poverty Groups Brace for Cuts

Multiple sources report that President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy met at Mar-a-Lago to discuss a U.S.-proposed peace plan for Ukraine, signaling potential progress despite ongoing Russian attacks and unresolved issues like the status of the Donbas region. While the meeting indicates momentum, both leaders acknowledged that further talks are necessary, and Trump is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to continue diplomatic efforts.

Cyber_Cat
Cyber_Cat
10