The court handed down suspended prison sentences of up to eight months to the majority of the defendants. One individual was immediately jailed for failing to appear in court. Several defendants also had their social media accounts suspended as part of the ruling. According to the judge, the eight men and two women demonstrated a clear intent to harm Brigitte Macron through their degrading and insulting online remarks.

The case highlights the growing problem of online harassment and the legal challenges in addressing it. Cyber-bullying, often involving coordinated attacks and the spread of misinformation, can have severe psychological and reputational consequences for victims. The prosecution argued that the coordinated nature of the online campaign against Brigitte Macron amplified its impact and warranted legal intervention.

Two of the defendants, Natacha Rey, a self-proclaimed independent journalist, and Amandine Roy, an internet fortune-teller, were previously found guilty of slander in 2024 for falsely claiming that France's First Lady did not exist and was, in fact, her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux who had undergone a gender transition. This conviction was later overturned on appeal. The appeals court reasoned that stating someone had changed gender did not constitute slander.

The legal proceedings against the ten individuals underscore the French legal system's attempt to grapple with online defamation and harassment. While freedom of speech is protected, the courts have demonstrated a willingness to prosecute individuals who engage in targeted campaigns of misinformation and abuse. The suspension of social media accounts also raises questions about the responsibility of social media platforms in moderating content and preventing the spread of harmful falsehoods.

The outcome of this case could influence future legal actions against cyber-bullies in France and potentially serve as a precedent for other countries facing similar challenges. The focus now shifts to monitoring the enforcement of the sentences and observing any potential appeals filed by the defendants. The case also prompts further discussion on the need for enhanced digital literacy and responsible online behavior.