U.S. foreign policy could face significant disruption if the United States were to pursue a takeover of Greenland, according to a report published on January 7, 2026. The prospect of a U.S. military takeover, an option reportedly considered by former President Donald Trump, has raised concerns about the stability of the NATO alliance and the future of U.S.-Danish relations.

Greenland's strategic importance stems from its geographical location and its wealth of natural resources, including rare earth minerals, gold, and oil. These resources have made the island a subject of geopolitical interest, particularly as demand for rare earth minerals increases globally.

Melinda Haring, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council Eurasia Center, stated in the report that a U.S. takeover of Greenland would have far-reaching implications for the NATO alliance. Denmark, a fellow NATO member, currently governs Greenland as an autonomous territory. Any attempt by the U.S. to seize control of the island would likely be viewed as a violation of international law and a breach of trust between allies.

The U.S. has a historical precedent for interest in Greenland. In 1946, the U.S. offered to purchase Greenland from Denmark for $100 million, an offer that was declined. The island's strategic location during World War II, particularly its proximity to Europe, made it a valuable asset for the U.S. military.

The current Danish government has not commented directly on the possibility of a U.S. takeover. However, officials have previously stated their commitment to maintaining Greenland's territorial integrity and its close relationship with Denmark. The Greenlandic government has also emphasized its desire to control its own natural resources and to benefit economically from their extraction.

The potential for a U.S. takeover remains speculative. However, the discussion surrounding the issue highlights the growing geopolitical importance of Greenland and the challenges facing U.S. foreign policy in the Arctic region. Further developments are expected as the U.S. continues to assess its strategic interests in the Arctic and its relationship with Denmark.