A Federal Communications Commission proposal to allow state and local prisons to jam contraband cell phones is facing opposition from wireless carriers who argue it would disrupt lawful communications. The proposal, supported by Republican attorneys general and prison phone companies, aims to curb illegal activity within correctional facilities, but wireless carriers, including CTIA, AT&T, and Verizon, contend that jamming technology blocks all communications, including emergency calls.

CTIA, a wireless lobby group, stated in December 29 comments to the FCC that jamming would block all communications, not just those from contraband devices. The organization also argued that the FCC lacks the authority to permit such jamming. AT&T echoed these concerns, stating that the proposed legal framework is based on a flawed factual premise.

The debate centers on the Communications Act, which prohibits interference with authorized radio communications. Chairman Brendan Carr's proposal attempts to circumvent this prohibition by de-authorizing certain communications within prisons. However, wireless carriers argue that this approach is a violation of the Act and would have unintended consequences for public safety.

Groups dedicated to Wi-Fi and GPS also raised concerns with the FCC. These groups fear that the jamming technology could extend beyond prison walls, disrupting vital communication services in surrounding areas. The potential for unintended interference raises questions about the precision and control of the proposed jamming systems.

The FCC proposal reflects ongoing efforts to address the problem of contraband cell phones in prisons. These devices are often used by inmates to conduct criminal activity, communicate with the outside world, and coordinate escapes. Proponents of jamming technology argue that it is a necessary tool to maintain order and security within correctional facilities.

The current status of the proposal is under review by the FCC. The commission is considering the comments and arguments presented by both proponents and opponents of the plan. The next steps will likely involve further analysis of the legal and technical issues, as well as potential testing of jamming technology in controlled environments. The FCC's decision will have significant implications for prison security, public safety, and the future of wireless communications policy.