In early 2026, President Donald Trump's administration initiated an operation in Venezuela that culminated in the seizure of President Nicolás Maduro, marking what some observers believe could be a shift in U.S. foreign policy towards a more expansionist approach. Aboard Air Force One, en route from Florida to Washington D.C., Trump reportedly told reporters that his government was now in charge of Venezuela and that U.S. companies were prepared to exploit the country's oil reserves.

The operation, according to Trump, was executed without any U.S. casualties, though he acknowledged casualties among Venezuelan and Cuban individuals. Following the Venezuelan action, Trump reportedly signaled to other nations that they could potentially face similar interventions.

The events in Venezuela have sparked debate regarding the nature of U.S. foreign policy under the Trump administration. Some analysts argue that these actions represent a new form of imperialism, characterized by direct intervention and resource extraction. Others contend that it is simply a more transparent version of traditional U.S. foreign policy, stripped of diplomatic niceties.

Critics of the administration's actions point to the potential violation of international law and the destabilizing effect on the region. They argue that such interventions undermine the sovereignty of nations and could lead to further conflict. Supporters, however, maintain that the U.S. has a responsibility to protect its interests and promote democracy abroad, even if it requires assertive action.

The situation in Venezuela remains fluid, with the U.S. government working to establish a new government and stabilize the country. The long-term implications of these actions for U.S. foreign policy and international relations are yet to be seen. The international community is closely watching developments, with many nations expressing concern over the potential for further interventions and the erosion of international norms.