The United States is increasingly perceived as a driver of global instability due to its foreign policy decisions, according to Ian Bremmer, president of the risk analysis firm Eurasia Group. Bremmer argued in an interview on January 11, 2026, that the "America First" approach has positioned the U.S. against the rule of law, free trade, and collective security, impacting its reliability on the global stage.

Bremmer stated that the international system, largely constructed by the U.S. over several decades, was already facing significant geopolitical challenges before the Trump administration. However, he contends that recent actions, such as projecting power in Venezuela and making assertive statements regarding Greenland, have exacerbated the situation. These actions, according to Bremmer, contribute to a perception of the U.S. as an unreliable partner for its allies and a significant source of geopolitical risk.

The discussion surrounding U.S. foreign policy and its impact on global stability is not new. Historically, the U.S. has played a central role in shaping international norms and institutions following World War II. This included the establishment of the United Nations, the Bretton Woods system (which created the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund), and various security alliances like NATO. These structures were designed to promote global cooperation and prevent future conflicts.

However, in recent years, there has been increasing debate about the U.S.'s commitment to these multilateral frameworks. Critics argue that a more unilateral approach, prioritizing national interests above collective action, undermines the stability of the international order. This shift is viewed by some as creating a vacuum that other powers may seek to fill, potentially leading to increased competition and instability.

The situation in Venezuela, for example, has drawn international scrutiny. The U.S. has taken a strong stance against the Maduro government, recognizing opposition leader Juan Guaidó as the legitimate interim president. This interventionist approach has been criticized by some as a violation of national sovereignty and an attempt to destabilize the region. Conversely, supporters argue that the U.S. is acting in defense of democracy and human rights.

The implications of these shifts in U.S. foreign policy are far-reaching. They affect not only the U.S.'s relationships with its traditional allies in Europe and Asia but also its standing in international organizations and its ability to address global challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and economic crises. The debate over the U.S.'s role in the world is likely to continue as the international landscape evolves and new challenges emerge.