The new blueprint, unveiled in November, aims to provide Kyiv with security guarantees to prevent future Russian aggression and includes provisions for rebuilding the war-ravaged nation. It was presented as a compromise to a previous plan developed by Kirill Dmitriev, a special envoy of Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Steve Witkoff, former President Trump's special envoy.

Aleksei Naumov, a Moscow-based analyst of international affairs, criticized the Ukrainian plan as disingenuous. "This is an absolute mockery," Naumov stated in a Telegram post. "The idea is clear: Pitch this to the Americans as a compromise, and then blame Russia for its failure."

The original peace plan, formulated in October, involved significant concessions from Ukraine, including territorial losses and a commitment to non-alignment with NATO. This proposal was seen as more favorable to Russia's interests, reflecting the geopolitical realities at the time. However, the new plan seeks to address Ukraine's security concerns and ensure its long-term stability.

Russia's recent military advances have emboldened the Kremlin, making it less inclined to accept a compromise that does not reflect its current position of strength. Furthermore, the Russian government faces the challenge of justifying any peace agreement to its citizens, who have been led to believe in the success of the "special military operation."

The rejection of the new peace plan could lead to a continuation of the conflict, with potentially devastating consequences for both Ukraine and Russia. International efforts to mediate a resolution are ongoing, but the prospects for a breakthrough remain uncertain. The United States and other Western allies continue to provide military and financial assistance to Ukraine, while also seeking diplomatic solutions to the crisis. The situation remains fluid, and the next steps will likely depend on the evolving dynamics on the battlefield and the willingness of both sides to engage in meaningful negotiations.