Saldo stated that the strike was carried out using three unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Images released by Saldo showed a heavily damaged building.

Ukraine did not directly respond to the allegations, stating that it does not comment on information from governors of occupied regions. However, Ukraine affirmed its adherence to international humanitarian law, stating that its strikes target exclusively military objectives.

A source within Ukraine's defense forces, as quoted by AFP news agency, confirmed that a strike took place, but asserted that the target was a military gathering closed to civilians.

The use of AI in analyzing such claims and counter-claims is becoming increasingly prevalent. AI algorithms can be used to analyze satellite imagery, social media posts, and other open-source information to verify the location of the strike, the extent of the damage, and the presence of military personnel. These algorithms often employ computer vision techniques to identify objects and patterns in images and videos, and natural language processing to analyze text data.

The application of AI in conflict zones raises ethical considerations. While AI can potentially provide more accurate and unbiased information, it is crucial to ensure that the data used to train these algorithms is reliable and free from bias. Furthermore, the use of AI in warfare raises concerns about autonomous weapons systems and the potential for unintended consequences.

The conflict in Ukraine has seen increased use of drones for both reconnaissance and attack purposes. The deployment of UAVs highlights the evolving nature of modern warfare and the challenges of distinguishing between military and civilian targets. International humanitarian law prohibits attacks that are not directed at a specific military objective or that are likely to cause disproportionate harm to civilians.

The current status of the investigation into the alleged attack remains unclear. International organizations and independent observers are likely to seek access to the site to assess the damage and gather evidence. The conflicting accounts from Russia and Ukraine underscore the difficulty of obtaining accurate information in conflict zones and the importance of independent verification. Future developments will likely involve further investigation and analysis of the available evidence to determine the circumstances surrounding the incident and assess potential violations of international law.