Timothée Chalamet's portrayal of Marty Mauser in "Marty Supreme" is sparking debate, with some critics questioning the character's likability, a sentiment Variety's Chief Film Critic Owen Gleiberman dismisses as reminiscent of "corrupt studio executives." Gleiberman argues that likability isn't a prerequisite for compelling characters, especially when brought to life by actors possessing undeniable charisma.

Gleiberman contends that Chalamet, like Dustin Hoffman, Julia Roberts, or Brad Pitt, possesses an "X factor" that captivates audiences regardless of the character's moral compass. He poses the rhetorical question, "Has there ever been a likable scoundrel in movies? No! Not Once!" suggesting that flawed characters can be just as, if not more, engaging than traditionally heroic ones.

The debate surrounding Marty Mauser's likability highlights a broader discussion within the film industry about audience expectations and the types of characters that resonate in contemporary cinema. Some argue that audiences are increasingly drawn to morally complex characters who reflect the ambiguities of real life, while others maintain that viewers still crave aspirational figures.

The cultural impact of "Marty Supreme" and Chalamet's performance remains to be seen, but Gleiberman's defense of the character suggests a potential shift in how audiences perceive and accept flawed protagonists. The film's success, or lack thereof, could influence future casting decisions and storytelling approaches, potentially paving the way for more morally ambiguous characters in mainstream cinema.