The submission argues that reasonable grounds exist to sanction Netanyahu, citing previous statements where he rejected a Palestinian state. According to the legal team, these statements, among others, constitute incitement and contribute to an environment conducive to violence. The specific legal basis for the request leverages the UK's sanctions regime, which allows for penalties against individuals deemed responsible for human rights violations.

The Arab Organisation for Human Rights UK is a non-governmental organization focused on documenting and addressing human rights abuses in the Arab world. Their decision to pursue sanctions against a sitting head of state reflects a growing trend of NGOs utilizing international legal mechanisms to hold individuals accountable for alleged violations. This approach is increasingly relevant in an era where artificial intelligence (AI) plays a role in documenting and analyzing potential human rights abuses. AI algorithms can process vast amounts of data, including social media posts, satellite imagery, and news reports, to identify patterns and evidence that might support claims of incitement or other violations.

The use of AI in human rights investigations raises both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, AI can significantly enhance the efficiency and scope of investigations, potentially leading to more effective accountability mechanisms. On the other hand, concerns exist regarding bias in algorithms and the potential for misuse of AI-generated evidence. Ensuring transparency and accountability in the application of AI in this context is crucial.

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office will now review the request and determine whether to impose sanctions. The decision-making process typically involves legal analysis, assessment of evidence, and consideration of the broader geopolitical context. The UK's response to this request will likely be closely watched by international observers, particularly given the ongoing conflict in Gaza and the broader debate surrounding international law and accountability. The outcome could set a precedent for future attempts to use national sanctions regimes to address alleged human rights violations by foreign leaders.