The United States' withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO), initiated a year ago by President Trump, is set to finalize this week. The move follows an executive order signed on his inauguration day, expressing dissatisfaction with the WHO's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, its perceived lack of necessary reforms, and its alleged inability to act independently from political influence.

This marks Trump's second attempt to sever ties with the global health agency. He initially began the withdrawal process in 2020, during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. President Biden reversed that decision upon entering office.

The executive order cited specific grievances, including the WHO's response to the pandemic originating in Wuhan, China, and other global health crises. The order also raised concerns about the organization's failure to implement urgent reforms and its susceptibility to undue political influence from member states.

The implications of the U.S. withdrawal extend to the WHO's funding and global health initiatives. The United States has historically been a major financial contributor to the WHO, and its absence could impact the organization's ability to respond to future health emergencies and implement critical programs. The question of unpaid dues from the U.S. remains unresolved.

The withdrawal raises questions about the future of international cooperation in addressing global health challenges. Some experts argue that a coordinated global response is essential to effectively combat pandemics and other health threats. Others maintain that the WHO needs significant reforms to ensure its effectiveness and accountability. The situation remains fluid, and future developments will likely depend on political and diplomatic factors.