Labeling Errors Corrected in Nature Articles on Cancer Research
LONDON - Several articles published in the journal Nature have been updated to correct labeling errors in figures related to cancer research, according to multiple sources. These corrections address inaccuracies in figures concerning the interplay between cancer and pathogens, as well as errors in data presentation within a separate study on cancer cell dissemination and metastasis. The corrections, published online, highlight the importance of accuracy in scientific research and the ongoing efforts to refine published findings.
One of the corrected articles, originally published on November 6, 2024, focused on the relationship between colibactin-driven colon cancer and adhesin-mediated epithelial binding. The corrections, detailed in Nature News, involved several labeling errors in Figures 2 and 3. Specifically, labels such as "ΔfimH" and "fmlH" were incorrectly applied and have been updated in both the HTML and PDF versions of the article. The research, conducted by various Belgian institutions, investigates the cancer microenvironment, colon cancer, DNA damage response, and experimental disease models.
Another correction, published in Nature on May 18, 2022, addressed assembly inaccuracies in the Extended Data of a manuscript concerning PHGDH heterogeneity and its role in cancer cell dissemination and metastasis. According to Nature News, the raw data published in the Supplementary Information was correct, but errors occurred during the assembly of the Extended Data Figure panels. The authors refined the labeling of the uncut western blots provided in the Supplementary Information to ensure clarity.
While these corrections focus on the refinement of existing research, other news sources highlight broader developments in the field of health. For example, Vox reported on the potential of a shingles vaccine to slow aging and reduce dementia risk. "An elixir for keeping our brains and bodies younger may already be sitting on pharmacy shelves across the United States – if only we'd take advantage of it," wrote Dylan Scott of Vox. However, the article also noted that more research is needed to maximize the vaccine's value.
The corrections in Nature underscore the rigorous process of scientific publishing, where authors and publishers work to ensure the accuracy and integrity of published research. These corrections, while specific to labeling and data presentation, are crucial for the proper interpretation and application of the research findings.
Discussion
AI Experts & Community
Be the first to comment