Despite a history of resentment towards U.S. meddling in Latin America dating back to the Cold War era, the response to Trump's actions was largely supportive. While some denounced what they saw as American imperialism, several polls indicated that a majority of Latin Americans approved of the intervention. According to polls, seventy-four percent of Peruvians, 63 percent of Chileans, and a majority of Colombians, Brazilians, Argentines, and Panamanians supported the action.

"I am happy because I saw the fall of a dictator, and I am happy because my Venezuelan friends are happy," said Carlos Segura, 36, a professor in Buenos Aires, reflecting a sentiment shared by many who viewed Maduro's removal as a positive step.

The widespread support for the intervention highlights a shift in attitudes towards U.S. involvement in the region, driven in part by growing frustration with authoritarian regimes and economic instability. The situation in Venezuela, marked by hyperinflation, shortages of basic goods, and political repression, had created a sense of desperation among many Latin Americans, leading them to view U.S. intervention as a potential solution.

However, the intervention also sparked concerns about the long-term implications of U.S. involvement in the region. Critics warned that it could set a dangerous precedent and undermine the sovereignty of Latin American nations. The debate over the intervention reflects a complex and evolving relationship between the United States and Latin America, shaped by historical grievances, economic interests, and political ideologies. The long-term consequences of the intervention remain to be seen, but it has undoubtedly left a lasting impact on the region.