Meta is attempting to limit the scope of evidence presented at an upcoming trial in New Mexico concerning child safety on its social media platforms. The company filed motions to exclude research studies and articles about social media's impact on youth mental health, references to a high-profile teen suicide case involving social media content, and information about Meta's financial resources, employee activities, and CEO Mark Zuckerberg's time at Harvard University, according to Ars Technica.

The trial in New Mexico centers around allegations that Meta failed to protect minors from sexual exploitation on its platforms. Meta's legal strategy involves motions in limine, requests to exclude certain information from court proceedings.

Legal experts, according to Ars Technica, have noted that while such motions are standard practice, the breadth of Meta's requests raises concerns about transparency and the ability to fully assess the company's responsibility in protecting young users. The case underscores the ongoing debate about the role of social media companies in safeguarding children's mental well-being. The trial's outcome could have significant implications for how social media companies are held accountable for the safety of their younger users.