The FBI executed a search warrant at Natanson's residence last week, seizing both her work and personal devices. Natanson is not the subject of the investigation, which centers on alleged leaks by a Pentagon contractor.

The Washington Post filed a motion seeking the return of the reporter's property and a separate motion for a standstill order to prevent review of the seized devices pending a court ruling on their return. According to a Post court filing, "Almost none of the seized data is even potentially responsive to the warrant, which seeks only records received from or relating to a single government contractor." The filing further argued that the seized data includes "core First Amendment-protected material."

The government's justification for the search warrant and seizure of devices has raised concerns about potential infringements on press freedom and the protection of confidential sources. Legal experts are closely watching the case, as it could set a precedent for future investigations involving journalists and government leaks.

Further proceedings will be held to determine the next steps, including whether the government will be allowed to resume its search of the devices or if they will be returned to Natanson and The Washington Post. The court's decision will likely address the balance between national security interests and the First Amendment rights of journalists.