The Trump administration is defending the killing of Alex Pretti by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis. The central argument focuses on the fact that Pretti possessed a gun. The incident occurred on [insert date based on the provided context, e.g., January 25, 2026] during an encounter with ICE agents.

Greg Bovino, Border Patrol commander-at-large, stated to CNN that Second Amendment rights do not apply during riots or assaults against law enforcement. FBI Director Kash Patel, speaking on Fox News, emphasized the illegality of carrying a loaded firearm with multiple magazines to a protest. These statements came amid growing criticism of the agents' actions.

The killing sparked immediate debate regarding the legality and justification of the use of force. Pro-gun advocates are questioning the administration's stance, citing Second Amendment rights. Critics argue the administration is being hypocritical.

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution protects an individual's right to bear arms. However, legal precedents establish limitations on this right, particularly in the context of criminal activity or threats to public safety. The specifics of the encounter between Pretti and the ICE agents are under investigation.

The Department of Justice is expected to release a statement. Further investigation is underway to determine the full circumstances surrounding Pretti's death. The legal implications of Pretti's possession of a firearm will be a key factor in the investigation.