4-model average
building category history
loading
37pt spread
The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.
Loading belief trajectory...
Given the current federal funds target range of 3.50%-3.75% and the recent shift in the June dot plot towards a hold-or-hike stance, market sentiment appears to be increasingly leaning towards the possibility of a rate hike. The resilience of the labor market, along with stable inflation and rising energy prices, supports the likelihood that the Warsh-led Fed might decide to raise rates before the end of 2026. Notably, key upcoming meetings in July and September will serve as critical junctures for any potential policy adjustments, reinforcing the probability of the upper bound exceeding 3.75%.
The September 2026 SEP median is likely to imply a year-end 2026 federal funds rate above the current 3.50%-3.75% target range given the recent hawkish pivot by the Warsh Fed, as evidenced by the shift in the June dot plot and market pricing towards hold-or-hike scenarios. Persistent inflation, resilient labor markets, and Fed communications emphasizing a desire to ensure inflation returns to target will likely drive projections for at least one additional rate hike in the remaining FOMC meetings of 2026.
The question requires the September 2026 SEP median to imply a year-end 2026 federal funds rate above 3.75% (the upper bound of the current June 17 target range). This would necessitate either (1) a rate hike before or during the September meeting, or (2) the SEP median itself projecting the upper bound above 3.75% by year-end despite no action yet taken. Given the June pivot toward "hold-or-hike" rather than cuts, the bar for a hike in July or September exists, but remains elevated. Historical precedent shows the Fed typically requires sustained inflation surprises or labor-market tightness to hike in mid-cycle; while energy prices and labor resilience are cited as supportive factors, the messaging emphasizes optionality rather than conviction. A single 25bp hike by September would satisfy the threshold. The probability reflects meaningful but still minority odds: the Warsh-led institutional reset and hawkish communications create asymmetric upside risk to rates, but four months of data between now and September 16 could easily shift the calculus back toward hold, and the SEP median in September could project year-end rates at or below 3.75% even if the Fed hasn't moved.
The June 17 SEP median projected a 3.625% year-end 2026 rate and the July 28-29 and September 15-16 meetings are the only remaining decision points before the September 16 resolution date; with inflation still above the 2% mandate at 2.7% core PCE (May release) and the unemployment rate at 4.1% (June data), Warsh’s July 15 Jackson Hole speech signaled a willingness to tolerate above-target inflation to preserve labor-market gains, lowering the odds of an explicit hike. Historical precedent shows only two unscheduled 25 bp hikes since 1994 and none in the first six months of a new Chair’s term.