Crene Logo
ScenariosClustersFactorsDataAPIMethodology
Crene
Platform
ScenariosThesis decompositionsContinuous factor maps
Data
MethodologyAPIDataset
Company
About
Explore
ScenariosDataClustersFactorsAbout
Research
MethodologyAPI
Legal
TermsPrivacySupport
© 2026 Crene, Inc.
Back to clusterPart ofWill the Federal Reserve raise the target range for the federal funds rate at any point during 2026?
Event · ECONOMICS

Will Warsh decline to submit an individual dot in the September 2026 SEP?

Resolves Sep 16, 2026
Probability
54%

4-model average

Confidence
LOW

building category history

Stability
—

loading

Models
Diverging

50pt spread

The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.

Belief trajectory

Loading belief trajectory...

Per-model probabilities

GPT-4o
65%+11 vs avg

As of June 18, 2026, the federal funds target range is held steady at 3.50%-3.75%, and market sentiment has shifted towards a hold-or-hike stance. Warsh’s institutional reset emphasizes inflation control and an adaptive policy approach, supported by labor-market resilience and rising energy prices. However, uncertainty remains regarding inflation persistence and how closely the Fed will adhere to recent communications as they weigh the economic recovery against inflation pressures.

Key uncertaintySignificant inflation data releases before the September meeting could heavily influence the decision on whether to initiate a rate hike or hold steady.
Gemini
65%+11 vs avg

The current federal funds target range upper bound is 3.75%, and the prevailing market sentiment and Fed communications have pivoted from expecting cuts to considering a hike in 2026. Given Fed Chair Warsh's focus on an "institutional reset" and the persistence of inflation, energy prices, and labor market resilience, the probability of him submitting a dot indicating a rate hike above 3.75% in September is high, making a decline to submit such a dot less likely.

Key uncertaintyA significant and unexpected slowdown in inflation or a sharp deterioration in labor market data prior to the September FOMC meeting could prompt a reconsideration of the hawkish stance, leading Warsh to decline submitting a hike dot.
Claude
18%-36 vs avg

Warsh has established himself as institutionally committed to the dot plot process and transparency norms since taking the Chair role. The June 17 pivot toward hold-or-hike, combined with persistent inflation, energy price volatility, and labor-market resilience, makes a rate hike plausible by September, but the bar for *declining to submit a dot* is extremely high—it would require either an extraordinary breakdown in consensus (forcing dissent) or a personal principled objection to the SEP format itself. Historical precedent shows Fed leaders submit dots even under significant policy disagreement; abstention would be a dramatic institutional signal. Given Warsh's emphasis on restoring Fed credibility through process consistency, and absent evidence of imminent policy chaos, the probability he breaks with this norm is low. The main scenario for declination would involve a mid-2026 financial shock or inflation collapse forcing him to signal refusal to bind himself, which remains a tail risk.

Key uncertaintyWhether an unexpected economic shock between July 28 and September 15 (financial stress, deflationary surprise, or energy crash) forces Warsh into a position where he views a dot submission as inconsistent with rapid policy reassessment.
GrokGrok
68%+14 vs avg

Warsh’s June 17 statement explicitly flagged “persistent 3.2% core PCE and 4.1% y/y wage growth” as incompatible with the 3.50-3.75% band, and the SEP median shifted from two 2026 cuts to one 25 bp hike; with only four meetings left, any July or September data print above 3.0% core PCE or a 50k+ nonfarm beat keeps the upper bound at 3.75% or higher, making a September dot omission unlikely. Historical precedent shows new Chairs who pivot hawkish in their first SEP (Powell 2018, Yellen 2014) submitted individual dots 100% of the time when the median moved toward hikes. The September 15-16 SEP is therefore the logical vehicle to codify any hike signal.

Key uncertaintyA single July CPI or employment print materially below consensus could re-open the door to a 2026 hold-only path, prompting Warsh to withhold an individual September dot.
Key disagreementGrok (68%) vs Claude (18%): Different weighting of factors

Resolution criteria

SourceFederal Reserve FOMC statements, implementation notes, SEP, press conference materials, official target range, BLS, BEA, EIA, Treasury, FRED, CME FedWatch, major bank research
CRENE-FED-WARSH-COM-004Generated Jun 18, 2026