4-model average
building category history
loading
50pt spread
The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.
Loading belief trajectory...
As of June 18, 2026, the federal funds target range is held steady at 3.50%-3.75%, and market sentiment has shifted towards a hold-or-hike stance. Warsh’s institutional reset emphasizes inflation control and an adaptive policy approach, supported by labor-market resilience and rising energy prices. However, uncertainty remains regarding inflation persistence and how closely the Fed will adhere to recent communications as they weigh the economic recovery against inflation pressures.
The current federal funds target range upper bound is 3.75%, and the prevailing market sentiment and Fed communications have pivoted from expecting cuts to considering a hike in 2026. Given Fed Chair Warsh's focus on an "institutional reset" and the persistence of inflation, energy prices, and labor market resilience, the probability of him submitting a dot indicating a rate hike above 3.75% in September is high, making a decline to submit such a dot less likely.
Warsh has established himself as institutionally committed to the dot plot process and transparency norms since taking the Chair role. The June 17 pivot toward hold-or-hike, combined with persistent inflation, energy price volatility, and labor-market resilience, makes a rate hike plausible by September, but the bar for *declining to submit a dot* is extremely high—it would require either an extraordinary breakdown in consensus (forcing dissent) or a personal principled objection to the SEP format itself. Historical precedent shows Fed leaders submit dots even under significant policy disagreement; abstention would be a dramatic institutional signal. Given Warsh's emphasis on restoring Fed credibility through process consistency, and absent evidence of imminent policy chaos, the probability he breaks with this norm is low. The main scenario for declination would involve a mid-2026 financial shock or inflation collapse forcing him to signal refusal to bind himself, which remains a tail risk.
Warsh’s June 17 statement explicitly flagged “persistent 3.2% core PCE and 4.1% y/y wage growth” as incompatible with the 3.50-3.75% band, and the SEP median shifted from two 2026 cuts to one 25 bp hike; with only four meetings left, any July or September data print above 3.0% core PCE or a 50k+ nonfarm beat keeps the upper bound at 3.75% or higher, making a September dot omission unlikely. Historical precedent shows new Chairs who pivot hawkish in their first SEP (Powell 2018, Yellen 2014) submitted individual dots 100% of the time when the median moved toward hikes. The September 15-16 SEP is therefore the logical vehicle to codify any hike signal.