Crene Logo
ScenariosClustersFactorsDataAPIMethodology
Crene
Platform
ScenariosThesis decompositionsContinuous factor maps
Data
MethodologyAPIDataset
Company
About
Explore
ScenariosDataClustersFactorsAbout
Research
MethodologyAPI
Legal
TermsPrivacySupport
© 2026 Crene, Inc.
Back to clusterPart ofWill the Federal Reserve raise the target range for the federal funds rate at any point during 2026?
Event · ECONOMICS

Will Q3 2026 real GDP growth print below 1.0% annualized in the advance estimate?

Resolves Oct 31, 2026
Probability
38%

4-model average

Confidence
LOW

building category history

Stability
—

loading

Models
Diverging

32pt spread

The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.

Belief trajectory

Loading belief trajectory...

Per-model probabilities

GPT-4o
30%-8 vs avg

Given the federal funds target range of 3.50%-3.75% and the shift towards a hold-or-hike stance by the Warsh Fed, the likelihood of low growth may increase. Historical patterns show that when the Fed maintains or raises rates in a high-inflation environment, GDP growth tends to decelerate; however, the resilience of the labor market suggests that consumer spending could remain relatively stable, preventing a deeply negative growth outcome. Recent inflation trends and resilience in energy prices could also exert pressure on growth.

Key uncertaintyA sudden spike in inflation or unexpected labor market weakness could significantly alter growth expectations, pushing GDP growth closer to or below the 1.0% threshold.
Gemini
60%+22 vs avg

The current federal funds target range of 3.50%-3.75%, coupled with the Fed's hawkish pivot and market pricing shifting towards "hold-or-hike" in 2026, suggests a restrictive monetary policy environment. This, combined with ongoing inflation concerns and labor market resilience, points to continued economic deceleration, making growth below 1.0% a plausible outcome. Historical precedents of tightening cycles leading to slower growth further support this.

Key uncertaintyThe extent and impact of any potential rate hikes by the Warsh Fed in the remaining FOMC meetings of 2026, specifically whether the upper bound of the target range rises above 3.75%, will significantly influence the growth trajectory.
Claude
28%-10 vs avg

Q3 2026 GDP growth printing below 1.0% annualized would require a meaningful economic slowdown from the current trajectory. As of June 18, 2026, the Fed has pivoted hawkish and is holding steady at 3.50%-3.75%, signaling confidence in economic resilience and inflation control rather than recessionary conditions. Historical precedent shows that GDP growth falls below 1.0% in advance estimates primarily during recessions or sharp contractions (e.g., Q2 2020, Q1 2020, Q4 2007); outside such episodes, trend growth typically exceeds this threshold. The labor market resilience noted in the scenario and the Fed's willingness to maintain restrictive policy suggest economic momentum remains intact. The probability reflects ~28% for a scenario requiring either an unexpected external shock (geopolitical, financial stress) or a lagged impact from prior tightening that materializes sharply in Q3—outcomes possible but not base-case given current conditions and the 3-month forward window from the as-of date.

Key uncertaintyWhether an unforeseen external shock (financial system stress, severe supply disruption, or geopolitical escalation) between June and September 2026 could trigger a sharp demand contraction not currently priced into consensus expectations or Fed communications.
GrokGrok
34%-4 vs avg

With the Warsh Fed holding the upper bound at 3.75% after the June 17 meeting and June dots/market pricing tilting hold-or-hike, the 3.50-3.75% range plus resilient June labor-market and sticky core-PCE prints point to a 2026H2 growth path of roughly 1.4-1.8% annualized rather than sub-1%; the historical precedent of only two post-1980 Q3s printing below 1% when the policy rate was above 3% further lowers the odds.

Key uncertaintyWhether the July 29 CPI and employment report show an abrupt enough deterioration to force the September 15-16 FOMC to cut 25 bp and thereby validate a sharper slowdown.
Key disagreementGemini (60%) vs Claude (28%): Different weighting of factors

Resolution criteria

SourceFederal Reserve FOMC statements, implementation notes, SEP, press conference materials, official target range, BLS, BEA, EIA, Treasury, FRED, CME FedWatch, major bank research
CRENE-FED-WARSH-MAC-014Generated Jun 18, 2026