Crene Logo
ScenariosClustersFactorsDataAPIMethodology
Crene
Platform
ScenariosThesis decompositionsContinuous factor maps
Data
MethodologyAPIDataset
Company
About
Explore
ScenariosDataClustersFactorsAbout
Research
MethodologyAPI
Legal
TermsPrivacySupport
© 2026 Crene, Inc.
Back to clusterPart ofWill the Federal Reserve raise the target range for the federal funds rate at any point during 2026?
Event · ECONOMICS

Will the 2-year Treasury yield close above 4.50% on any trading day in H2 2026?

Resolves Dec 31, 2026
Probability
53%

4-model average

Confidence
LOW

building category history

Stability
—

loading

Models
Diverging

44pt spread

The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.

Belief trajectory

Loading belief trajectory...

Per-model probabilities

GPT-4o
60%+7 vs avg

As of June 18, 2026, the 2-year Treasury yield stands at 3.647%, influenced by a federal funds target range of 3.50%-3.75% after the recent FOMC meeting. The shift toward a hold-or-hike stance, marked by Kevin Warsh's recent hawkish pivot, suggests a probability of rate hikes at the upcoming meetings, especially if inflation continues to be persistent and labor market resilience is maintained, potentially driving the 2-year yield above 4.50%.

Key uncertaintyA surprise economic downturn or deflationary pressures could impede the Fed's ability to hike rates, keeping the 2-year yield subdued.
Gemini
55%+2 vs avg

With the Federal Funds target range at 3.50%-3.75% and the market pricing shifting towards a hold-or-hike scenario for the remainder of 2026 under Chair Warsh, the 2-year Treasury yield, currently at 3.647%, is likely to trade above 4.50%. This would imply an additional 75 basis points or more of tightening, which is plausible if inflation remains sticky, energy prices rise, or labor market resilience continues to challenge disinflationary trends, prompting further hawkish Fed action.

Key uncertaintyThe extent and persistence of inflation, particularly if energy prices experience a significant and sustained surge, could force the Fed to hike rates further than currently anticipated, pushing the 2-year yield well above 4.50%.
Claude
72%+19 vs avg

The 2-year Treasury currently trades at 3.647%, requiring a 85.3 bps move to reach 4.50%. With the Fed holding at 3.50%-3.75% post-June 17 and Warsh signaling a hawkish pivot toward hold-or-hike positioning, a rate hike (moving the upper bound to 4.75%+) at any of four remaining 2026 FOMC meetings would likely push the 2-year well above 4.50% given term-premium dynamics and the current inflation/labor resilience backdrop. Historical precedent shows 2-year yields typically trade 50-120 bps above the fed funds upper bound; if the Fed hikes even once, the 2-year would likely exceed 4.50%. Market pricing has shifted from cuts to hold-or-hike, and Warsh's institutional reset messaging combined with energy/inflation pressures and strong labor data creates material upside risk to yields through year-end. The probability reflects ~72% odds of at least one 2026 rate hike occurring, which would with high confidence push 2-year yields above 4.50%.

Key uncertaintyWhether inflation and/or labor-market data deteriorate sufficiently between now and December to force the Warsh Fed to pivot back toward cuts instead of hikes, which would keep the 2-year yield below 4.50%.
GrokGrok
28%-25 vs avg

With the 2y at 3.647% and the Fed's upper bound at 3.75%, the 75 bp gap to 4.50% would require either an unscheduled 50 bp hike or consecutive 25 bp hikes at two of the four remaining 2026 meetings; Warsh's June pivot has only shifted dots and OIS pricing from 2–3 cuts to a hold-or-hike median, not to a 100 bp tightening path, so the required repricing would need both a sustained 0.4 pp rise in core PCE prints and a 100k+ monthly NFP surprise through September.

Key uncertaintyWhether July or September core PCE exceeds 3.2% y/y and triggers an explicit hawkish inter-meeting signal from Chair Warsh.
Key disagreementClaude (72%) vs Grok (28%): Different weighting of factors

Resolution criteria

SourceFederal Reserve FOMC statements, implementation notes, SEP, press conference materials, official target range, BLS, BEA, EIA, Treasury, FRED, CME FedWatch, major bank research
CRENE-FED-WARSH-MKT-002Generated Jun 18, 2026