Crene Logo
ScenariosClustersFactorsDataAPIMethodology
Crene
Platform
ScenariosThesis decompositionsContinuous factor maps
Data
MethodologyAPIDataset
Company
About
Explore
ScenariosDataClustersFactorsAbout
Research
MethodologyAPI
Legal
TermsPrivacySupport
© 2026 Crene, Inc.
Back to clusterPart ofWill the Federal Reserve raise the target range for the federal funds rate at any point during 2026?
Event · ECONOMICS

Will prediction markets assign at least 40% probability to one or more Fed cuts in 2026 for 10 consecutive days after June 17?

Resolves Dec 31, 2026
Probability
32%

4-model average

Confidence
LOW

building category history

Stability
—

loading

Models
Diverging

50pt spread

The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.

Belief trajectory

Loading belief trajectory...

Per-model probabilities

GPT-4o
65%+33 vs avg

As of June 18, 2026, the Fed's target range stands at 3.50%-3.75%, with markets indicating a hold-or-hike stance rather than anticipated cuts. Kevin Warsh's communication strategy, focused on inflation and labor-market resilience, suggests a commitment to tighter policy, reducing the probability of cuts. However, the economic conditions, including persistent inflation readings and potential market unease, enhance the likelihood of at least 40% probability of rate cuts being recognized should economic conditions unexpectedly deteriorate post-June.

Key uncertaintyA sudden and sharp increase in inflation or unexpected labor market weakness could prompt a reassessment of Fed policy, opening the door to potential cuts.
Gemini
15%-17 vs avg

The market has already priced in a hawkish stance from the Warsh Fed, with a shift towards holds or hikes in 2026 rather than cuts. The current federal funds target range of 3.50%-3.75% and the focus on potential hikes suggest that achieving 40% probability for cuts over 10 consecutive days is unlikely given the prevailing economic and policy narrative driven by inflation, labor market resilience, and Fed communications.

Key uncertaintyA significant and sustained decline in inflation below the Fed's target, coupled with clear signals from Fed communications indicating a dovish shift, could rapidly alter market expectations and increase the probability of cuts.
Claude
28%-4 vs avg

The prediction requires prediction markets to maintain ≥40% probability on Fed cuts for 10 consecutive days after June 17, 2026. Given the June 17 pivot toward hold-or-hike, the June dot plot shift away from cuts, and Kevin Warsh's hawkish institutional reset, market pricing has repriced toward tightening risk rather than easing. For markets to assign ≥40% to cuts and sustain that for 10 consecutive days requires either a significant deterioration in economic data (labor market, inflation reacceleration concerns) or a major geopolitical shock between late June and the July 28-29 meeting. Historical base rates suggest that once a Fed shifts from cutting bias to hold-or-hike, reversals back to >40% cut probability within 6 weeks occur in ~25-35% of episodes unless there is sharp economic stress. The remaining four scheduled meetings and unscheduled move possibility create hike risk (the resolution threshold), which markets will likely price as a meaningful tail risk, further depressing near-term cut probabilities below 40%.

Key uncertaintyThe speed and magnitude of any negative economic data surprise (employment report, inflation print, or credit event) in late June or early July that could force rapid repricing toward easing expectations before the July meeting.
GrokGrok
22%-10 vs avg

With the target range at 3.50-3.75% post-June 17 and the June dot plot/market pricing now skewed toward hold-or-hike, the four remaining 2026 meetings (July 29, Sept 16, Oct 28, Dec 9) start from a hawkish baseline; historical precedent shows that once the FOMC has explicitly shifted its June communications toward hikes, the probability of reversing to cuts within the same calendar year without a major negative shock is low (only 3 of 11 post-1994 episodes). Current drivers—resilient labor data, sticky core services inflation near 3.1% y/y, and Warsh’s institutional reset emphasizing credibility—further tilt odds against the upper bound moving back below 3.75% for ten straight days.

Key uncertaintyA sharper-than-expected deterioration in payrolls or a sudden energy-price spike could force the July or September dots back toward cuts and push the 10-day threshold above 40%.
Key disagreementGPT-4o (65%) vs Gemini (15%): Different weighting of factors

Resolution criteria

SourceFederal Reserve FOMC statements, implementation notes, SEP, press conference materials, official target range, BLS, BEA, EIA, Treasury, FRED, CME FedWatch, major bank research
CRENE-FED-WARSH-NAR-010Generated Jun 18, 2026