4-model average
building category history
loading
44pt spread
The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.
Loading belief trajectory...
Given that the federal funds target range is currently at 3.50%-3.75% following a hawkish shift in June under Chair Warsh, the likelihood of hikes at the remaining meetings hinges on persistent inflation and labor market strength. Recent economic indicators, such as stable job growth and rising energy prices, support the Fed's need to maintain a tighter stance, though market sentiment has also shifted towards holding rates, suggesting a delicate balancing act.
The Federal Reserve under Chair Warsh has signaled a hawkish pivot, with the June dot plot and market pricing shifting towards holding rates or even hiking in 2026, rather than cutting. Given the current federal funds target range of 3.50%-3.75% and the stated focus on whether the upper bound will rise above 3.75%, the prevailing sentiment suggests a strong inclination to maintain or increase rates if inflation and labor market resilience persist. This environment makes holding rates unchanged at all remaining meetings plausible, but a hike remains a significant possibility.
The FOMC must hold rates unchanged across all four remaining 2026 meetings (July, September, October, December) to resolve affirmatively. Given Kevin Warsh's hawkish institutional positioning, the June pivot toward hold-or-hike rhetoric, persistent labor-market resilience, and elevated energy prices, the baseline policy stance favors either holding or hiking rather than cutting. However, the explicit threshold requires the upper bound to remain at or below 3.75%, meaning even a single 25bp hike triggers resolution to "no." Historical precedent shows that Fed chairs signaling hawkish pivots typically follow through within 4-6 months when inflation and labor data remain sticky; Warsh's credibility as a hawk and the dotplot shift toward hikes suggests >40% probability of at least one rate increase through year-end. Offsetting factors include potential economic deterioration, financial stress, or geopolitical shocks that could force the Fed to reverse course mid-cycle, and the mere fact that the June communication emphasized flexibility rather than commitment. The combination of hawkish intent, four remaining meetings, and the high bar of *zero* hikes across all meetings yields a sub-30% probability of unchanged rates.
The Warsh Fed’s June 17, 2026 pivot to “hold-or-hike” language and the upward shift in the June dot plot—placing a median 2026 year-end upper bound of 3.75%—create a high bar for any move above that level; with core PCE at 2.7% y/y and the unemployment rate at 4.1% in May, the data backdrop still lacks the decisive re-acceleration needed to justify the first hike since 2023. Historical precedent shows that when the median dot and market pricing (fed-funds futures at 3.72% for December 2026) align on unchanged policy, the probability of an intra-year hike falls below 30%.