Will any FOMC voting member publicly call for changing the primary inflation data source used in policy communication? | Crene

Back to thesis map Part ofWill the Federal Reserve raise the target range for the federal funds rate at any point during 2026?

Current eventWarsh institutional reset

Will any FOMC voting member publicly call for changing the primary inflation data source used in policy communication?

LiveResolves Dec 31, 2026

Current view

19%

Current 4 model consensus

Movement

Recent consensus movement

Model disagreement

11pt

Range across the model set

Evidence

Contested

Material disagreement remains

Thesis map

What is carrying or resisting the view?

Start with the map. Select a mechanism or condition to see what supports the thesis, what resists it, and where disagreement deserves review.

What changed

No decision-relevant findings are available yet.

Daily Updates

Daily snapshots across the full thesis map, weekly freezes, and the preserved map version.

Why the view is fragile

11pt model spread around 19% consensus. Open the full disagreement instrument only when you need the model-level reasoning.

Model disagreement

Model spread

11pt

14% to 25%

Consensus

19%

4 models

Evidence state

Contested

Material disagreement remains

Most divergent

GPT-4o

+6pt from consensus

Disagreement synthesis

The models share a central case but assign different weight to the evidence.

Grok anchors the lower end at 14%, while GPT-4o anchors the upper end at 25%. Consensus sits at 19%, leaving a 11 point range for review.

Primary review question

A significant and unexpected shift in inflation trends or public sentiment regarding inflation measurement could lead members to advocate for changing the primary inflation data source in policy discussions.

Shared probability axis

Range 14% to 25%

Consensus 19%

Grok 14

Claude 18

Gemini 20

GPT-4o 25

0255075100

ModelForecastVs consensusDivergenceReasoning signal

Model reasoning

Select a model to inspect

Reasoning

The FOMC, under Kevin Warsh's leadership, is currently prioritizing rate stability, evident from the unchanged federal funds target range of 3.50 to 3.75 percent since June 2026. Additionally, with nine of eighteen SEP participants projecting the year-end 2026 rate above the current target range, there is a strong focus on rate forecasting rather than altering inflation measurement protocols, which typically have established historical benchmarks.

Key uncertainty

Deep dive

Full decomposition, component audit, trajectory, and detailed analytical views.

Deep dive

Detailed evidence, audit, and history views.

Open only what you need

Belief trajectoryConsensus 19% · 11pt spread

Belief trajectory0 updates

Belief trajectory

Consensus—

Spread—

Confidence—

Δ Consensus—

Loading belief trajectory…

Resolution & provenance

Resolution sources, record policy, cadence, and permanent record metadata.

Resolution and provenance

How the thesis resolves and how its record is maintained.

Permanent record

Resolution sources

Federal Reserve FOMC statementsimplementation notesSEPpress conference materialsofficial target rangeBLSBEAEIATreasuryFREDCME FedWatchmajor bank research

Record ID

CRENE-FED-WARSH-REG-005

Record policy

Append only

Freeze cadence

Thursdays

Generated

Sep 19, 2026

Back to thesis map Part ofWill the Federal Reserve raise the target range for the federal funds rate at any point during 2026?

Current eventWarsh institutional reset

Will any FOMC voting member publicly call for changing the primary inflation data source used in policy communication?

LiveResolves Dec 31, 2026

Current view

19%

Current 4 model consensus

Movement

Recent consensus movement

Model disagreement

11pt

Range across the model set

Evidence

Contested

Material disagreement remains

Thesis map

What is carrying or resisting the view?

Start with the map. Select a mechanism or condition to see what supports the thesis, what resists it, and where disagreement deserves review.

What changed

No decision-relevant findings are available yet.

Daily Updates

Daily snapshots across the full thesis map, weekly freezes, and the preserved map version.

Why the view is fragile

11pt model spread around 19% consensus. Open the full disagreement instrument only when you need the model-level reasoning.

Model disagreement

Model spread

11pt

14% to 25%

Consensus

19%

4 models

Evidence state

Contested

Material disagreement remains

Most divergent

GPT-4o

+6pt from consensus

Disagreement synthesis

The models share a central case but assign different weight to the evidence.

Grok anchors the lower end at 14%, while GPT-4o anchors the upper end at 25%. Consensus sits at 19%, leaving a 11 point range for review.

Primary review question

Shared probability axis

Range 14% to 25%

Consensus 19%

Grok 14

Claude 18

Gemini 20

GPT-4o 25

0255075100

ModelForecastVs consensusDivergenceReasoning signal

Model reasoning

Select a model to inspect

Reasoning

Key uncertainty

Deep dive

Full decomposition, component audit, trajectory, and detailed analytical views.

Deep dive

Detailed evidence, audit, and history views.

Open only what you need

Belief trajectoryConsensus 19% · 11pt spread

Belief trajectory0 updates

Belief trajectory

Consensus—

Spread—

Confidence—

Δ Consensus—

Loading belief trajectory…

Resolution & provenance

Resolution sources, record policy, cadence, and permanent record metadata.

Resolution and provenance

How the thesis resolves and how its record is maintained.

Permanent record

Resolution sources

Federal Reserve FOMC statementsimplementation notesSEPpress conference materialsofficial target rangeBLSBEAEIATreasuryFREDCME FedWatchmajor bank research

Record ID

CRENE-FED-WARSH-REG-005

Record policy

Append only

Freeze cadence

Thursdays

Generated

Sep 19, 2026