Since the United States announced intentions to exert control over Venezuela, the Trump administration has suggested similar interventions in other countries, with Greenland emerging as a primary focus, raising questions about the limits of presidential power and Congress's ability to act as a check. These actions, largely pursued through unilateral executive decisions, have prompted concern among some Republicans as President Trump enters his final term.

The administration's interest in Greenland, a NATO member and long-standing U.S. partner, has been met with resistance, prompting discussions in Congress about potential responses. Annie Grayer, a senior reporter at CNN, noted a growing unease on Capitol Hill, highlighting a "small but notable" split among Republicans regarding the administration's approach.

The situation follows the U.S. government's move to effectively control Venezuela and its president, Nicolás Maduro, which has set a precedent for potential interventions in other nations. The focus on Greenland, however, has amplified concerns due to the country's allied status with the U.S.

Protests have already occurred, such as the demonstration outside the U.S. Embassy in Copenhagen on January 14, 2026, where protestors carrying Greenland flags voiced their opposition under the banner "Greenland Belongs to the Greenlanders."

The potential for congressional action remains uncertain, but the emerging division within the Republican party suggests a possible avenue for legislative challenges to the administration's policies. The coming months will likely determine the extent to which Congress can influence the president's foreign policy decisions regarding Greenland and other nations.