Democrats believe a war-powers resolution limiting President Donald Trump's actions regarding Greenland would garner more Republican support than a similar resolution concerning Venezuela, given growing unease among GOP lawmakers over Trump's assertive foreign policy. This assessment comes amid increasing concern on Capitol Hill and internationally about the potential implications of Trump's "go-it-alone" approach for global order and the future of long-standing alliances.

Republican lawmakers have been actively working to mitigate the potential fallout from Trump's repeated suggestions of acquiring Greenland from Denmark. Some Republicans have voiced strong opposition, a departure from their usual stance on the administration's policies. Actions taken include floor speeches emphasizing the importance of NATO, the introduction of bills designed to prevent a U.S. attack on Denmark, and a bipartisan congressional delegation's visit to Copenhagen to engage with Danish officials.

Senator Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware, told The Associated Press that the repeated threats from the U.S. president towards Danish territory were being taken seriously. Coons organized the bipartisan trip to Denmark with the aim of de-escalating tensions and fostering continued dialogue on matters of mutual concern.

The situation highlights a broader debate about the role of the United States in international affairs and the importance of multilateralism. NATO, a cornerstone of transatlantic security since its founding in 1949, has faced scrutiny under the Trump administration, which has questioned the commitment of some member states to defense spending targets. The prospect of the U.S. unilaterally pursuing territorial acquisition in the Arctic raises concerns about the stability of the region, which is of increasing strategic importance due to climate change and resource competition.

The Arctic region holds significant geopolitical importance, with nations like Russia, Canada, and Denmark vying for influence. Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, occupies a strategic location and is believed to possess substantial mineral resources. Any attempt by the U.S. to acquire Greenland would have far-reaching implications for the region's balance of power and international relations.

The potential for a war-powers resolution focused on Greenland to attract Republican support reflects a growing divide within the GOP regarding Trump's foreign policy. While many Republicans have traditionally supported a strong U.S. military presence and assertive foreign policy, some are wary of unilateral actions that could undermine alliances and destabilize international relations. The coming weeks are likely to see further debate and maneuvering on Capitol Hill as lawmakers grapple with the implications of the president's approach to foreign policy.