Doucet pointed to Trump's inauguration speech, where she noted the invocation of the 19th-century doctrine of "manifest destiny," suggesting a belief in the United States' divinely ordained right to expand its influence. She cited Trump's stated intentions regarding the Panama Canal and Greenland as examples of this assertive approach. "We're taking it back," Trump reportedly announced regarding the Panama Canal, and "We have to have it," became the mantra concerning Greenland, according to Doucet.

The international correspondent highlighted a history of controversial American interventions, occupations, and covert operations. However, she emphasized that Trump's approach represents a unique challenge to the existing global framework.

While Doucet's analysis presents a critical perspective, other observers maintain that Trump's policies are a necessary correction to what they view as decades of unfavorable trade deals and an erosion of American sovereignty. Supporters argue that his actions are aimed at prioritizing American interests and renegotiating international agreements to better serve the United States.

Critics, however, express concern that Trump's unilateral actions and disregard for international institutions undermine global stability and cooperation. They argue that his policies weaken alliances and create uncertainty in the international arena.

The implications of Trump's foreign policy decisions continue to be debated and analyzed by policymakers and experts worldwide. The coming years will likely reveal the long-term consequences of these shifts in the global order.