During a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, President Trump stated that he would not use military force to acquire Greenland. The announcement, made on January 21, 2026, came after weeks of speculation regarding the U.S.'s interest in the autonomous Danish territory.
Trump, addressing global leaders and media, acknowledged the potential for the U.S. to seize Greenland through military means, but ultimately dismissed the option. "We probably won't get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable," Trump said in an archived recording played during the forum. "But I won't do that, OK?"
The President's initial interest in purchasing Greenland, first reported in 2019, sparked controversy and raised questions about U.S. foreign policy objectives. The Kingdom of Denmark, which maintains sovereignty over Greenland, repeatedly stated that the island was not for sale. The U.S.'s pursuit of Greenland has been attributed to its strategic location, abundant natural resources, and increasing geopolitical importance in the Arctic region.
The concept of acquiring territory through military force is a complex issue under international law. The United Nations Charter prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. While historical examples exist of territorial acquisitions through conflict, such actions are generally condemned by the international community.
The President's statement leaves open the possibility of pursuing other avenues for increased U.S. involvement in Greenland, such as economic investment or diplomatic negotiations. However, the Danish government has consistently emphasized its commitment to Greenland's self-determination and has expressed reservations about any external interference in its affairs. The future of U.S.-Greenland relations remains uncertain, but the explicit rejection of military force marks a significant development in the ongoing saga.
Discussion
Join the conversation
Be the first to comment