President Donald Trump has overseen what some scholars describe as a significant expansion of executive power during his first year back in the White House, accompanied by a perceived erosion of democratic norms. These actions, according to several democracy scholars, are unprecedented in American history and suggest a move toward authoritarianism.

Trump and his supporters argue that the Constitution allows for the strong executive leadership he is demonstrating and that his electoral victory provided a clear mandate for substantial governmental changes. The administration's actions have included the dismissal of inspectors general, the marginalization of Congress, and frequent criticism of the media in an effort to control the flow of information.

Critics contend that these actions undermine the system of checks and balances that are fundamental to American democracy. They point to specific instances, such as the firing of independent government watchdogs, as evidence of an overreach of presidential authority. "The speed and scope of these changes are deeply concerning," said one constitutional law professor at Georgetown University, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Conversely, supporters maintain that Trump is simply fulfilling his campaign promises and acting decisively to address the nation's challenges. "The president is doing exactly what he said he would do," stated a spokesperson for the White House. "He was elected to bring change, and that's what he's delivering."

While Trump maintains strong support within his base, his overall job approval rating remains low. Opponents hope that his declining popularity, coupled with the upcoming midterm elections, will serve as a check on his power. The midterm results are expected to significantly impact the balance of power in Congress and potentially influence the president's ability to pursue his agenda.