Crene Logo
Review a thesisExamplesMethodologyData
Crene
Platform
Review a thesisExamples
Data
MethodologyDataAPI documentation
Company
About
Explore
Review one thesisThesis MapsFactorsScenariosDataAbout
Research
MethodologyAPI
Legal
TermsPrivacySupport
© 2026 Crene, Inc.
Back to thesis mapPart ofDoes realized enterprise economic adoption of generative AI materially lag AI infrastructure investment expansion by December 31, 2026?
Event · ENTERPRISE ADOPTION & DEPLOYMENT

Will CIO survey data show more than 35% of enterprises pulling back generative AI budgets by Q4 2026?

Resolves Dec 31, 2026
Probability
36%

4-model average

Confidence
LOW

building category history

Stability
—

loading

Models
Mixed

17pt spread

The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.

Belief trajectory

Loading belief trajectory...

Per-model probabilities

GPT-4o
45%+9 vs avg

Given the rising economic pressures, including inflation and potential recession fears, many enterprises may reassess their IT budgets, including generative AI investments. Recent surveys indicate that 27% of organizations are already considering budget reallocations for AI initiatives due to economic uncertainties, suggesting a trend towards pulling back if conditions worsen. Additionally, with increasing scrutiny on AI ethics and ROI, companies might prioritize more immediate, tangible tech investments over generative AI.

Key uncertaintyThe pace of technological advancements and breakthroughs in generative AI that could demonstrate clear, immediate value might provoke enterprises to maintain or even increase budgets despite economic pressures.
Gemini
45%+9 vs avg

While generative AI investment remains high, enterprise budget reviews are intensifying, with early indicators from recent IT spending surveys suggesting a cooling. A projected economic slowdown in 2025-2026, combined with increasing concerns about ROI and operational costs, could lead a significant portion of enterprises to re-evaluate and potentially curtail generative AI initiatives, pushing the pullback figure towards 35%.

Key uncertaintyThe pace and success of generative AI's integration into core business processes and the clear demonstration of tangible ROI by Q4 2026 will be the most critical factor influencing budget decisions.
Claude
28%-8 vs avg

While 35% pullback is possible if macro conditions deteriorate sharply or ROI disappointment accelerates, current survey data shows 55-60% of enterprises actively increasing GenAI budgets with strong competitive motivation to maintain investment. Historical precedent suggests tech budget pullbacks require 3+ years of sustained underperformance; GenAI is only ~2 years into mainstream enterprise adoption. A threshold of 35% pullback by Q4 2026 would represent dramatic reversal from present momentum requiring either severe recession or unexpected regulatory action.

Key uncertaintyNot specified
GrokGrok
28%-8 vs avg

Current CIO surveys (Gartner 2024, Deloitte Q3 2024) show 72-78% of enterprises maintaining or increasing GenAI spend through 2025 with only 12-15% reporting planned cuts, and historical IT budget data indicates pullbacks of this magnitude typically require either a recession (probability <25% by 2026 per IMF forecasts) or clear ROI failure signals that have not yet materialized at scale; structural factors including committed multi-year cloud contracts and regulatory compliance spending further anchor budgets above the 35% threshold.

Key uncertaintyWhether measurable productivity gains from GenAI deployments will be documented in enterprise P&Ls by mid-2026, potentially triggering widespread reassessment if ROI remains below 10%.

Resolution criteria

SourceMorgan Stanley CIO Survey, JPMorgan CIO Tech Index, Gartner CIO Panel Q3-Q4 2026
CRENE-AIER-03-20261231Generated Jun 20, 2026