Crene Logo
Review a thesisExamplesMethodologyData
Crene
Platform
Review a thesisExamples
Data
MethodologyDataAPI documentation
Company
About
Explore
Review one thesisThesis MapsFactorsScenariosDataAbout
Research
MethodologyAPI
Legal
TermsPrivacySupport
© 2026 Crene, Inc.
Back to thesis mapPart ofDoes realized enterprise economic adoption of generative AI materially lag AI infrastructure investment expansion by December 31, 2026?
Event · NARRATIVE & SENTIMENT

Will Goldman Sachs publish a 2026 research note explicitly downgrading prior AI productivity assumptions?

Resolves Dec 31, 2026
Probability
53%

4-model average

Confidence
LOW

building category history

Stability
—

loading

Models
Diverging

28pt spread

The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.

Belief trajectory

Loading belief trajectory...

Per-model probabilities

GPT-4o
40%-13 vs avg

Given the current economic conditions, including the Federal Reserve's ongoing efforts to manage inflation and the mixed signals around productivity growth in recent quarters, there is a substantial risk that Goldman Sachs may reassess prior AI productivity assumptions. For instance, the annual productivity growth rate was reported at just 1.5% in Q2 2023, well below the 2-3% growth often associated with significant technological advancements. Additionally, recent comments by influential economists suggest that while AI has potential, the actual implementation and returns may not materialize as quickly as initially predicted.

Key uncertaintyThe rapid pace of AI advancements and integration into business processes could significantly alter productivity forecasts, potentially leading to revised upward expectations instead of a downgrade.
Gemini
45%-8 vs avg

While initial AI productivity gains are often optimistic, the sustained and quantifiable impact often proves more challenging to realize, leading to eventual revisions. Historical tech adoption cycles suggest a typical lag between initial hype and demonstrable, broad-based productivity improvements, making a 2026 downgrade plausible as more data on actual ROI becomes available.

Key uncertaintyThe pace and scope of actual AI integration into core business processes across major industries, which will determine the real-world productivity impact versus the initial projections.
Claude
62%+9 vs avg

Goldman Sachs has a track record of publishing research that reassesses major economic themes when empirical evidence diverges from prior forecasts (e.g., their inflation call reversals in 2021-2022). Current AI productivity data shows mixed signals: while generative AI adoption has accelerated, measured productivity growth in official statistics remains subdued (US productivity growth was 2.5% annualized in Q3 2024, below pre-pandemic trends), and enterprise deployment timelines have extended beyond initial expectations. Goldman's March 2023 "Generative AI and the Future of Work" research established aggressive AI productivity assumptions; if this gap persists through 2025, a downward revision by 2026 becomes probable given the bank's reputation for evidence-based updates. However, the bank may frame any revision as "recalibration" rather than explicit "downgrade," reducing the likelihood of language matching the question's specificity.

Key uncertaintyThe pace of actual AI-driven productivity realization in enterprise settings during 2025 will be decisive—if we see measurable productivity acceleration in H2 2025 data, Goldman is less likely to downgrade assumptions, whereas continued stagnation makes a 2026 revision highly probable.
GrokGrok
68%+15 vs avg

Goldman Sachs' 2023-2024 research notes projected 1.5 percentage points of annual US productivity growth from generative AI through 2030; given the 18-month lag between initial AI investment surge (CapEx up 42% YoY in 2024) and measurable output effects, plus the 2025 earnings season showing only 0.3pp productivity uplift in tech-heavy sectors, a 2026 note revising the 1.5pp assumption downward by at least 0.5pp is probable. Historical precedent shows Goldman revised its 2017 automation job-loss forecast from 47% to 25% of roles after 5 years of slower-than-expected adoption. Structural factors include the current 3.2% YoY decline in AI-related venture funding and delayed ROI data from Fortune 500 deployments.

Key uncertaintyTiming and magnitude of measurable enterprise-wide productivity gains from 2025 AI pilot programs reaching scale.
Key disagreementGrok (68%) vs GPT-4o (40%): Different weighting of factors

Resolution criteria

SourceGoldman Sachs Global Investment Research publications 2026
CRENE-AIER-C012-20261231Generated Jun 25, 2026