4-model average
building category history
loading
27pt spread
The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.
Loading belief trajectory...
As of 2023, there is increasing momentum for regulations surrounding emerging technologies, particularly generative AI, as evidenced by recent proposals in multiple states. For instance, California and New York have shown intent to introduce legislation addressing AI consumer protections, aligning with the broader trend of tech regulation that followed the revelations of data privacy vulnerabilities over the last few years. Additionally, with 25 states having introduced some form of AI legislation by late 2023, the trend suggests a likelihood of at least 3 states successfully passing binding laws by 2026.
While legislative momentum for AI regulation is growing, evidenced by a surge in proposed bills at both federal and state levels in 2023 and 2024, the actual enactment of *binding consumer protection laws* is a slower process. States like California and New York have introduced significant AI legislation, but these often face lengthy deliberation, amendment, and debate cycles, making the passage of *multiple* binding laws by year-end 2026 challenging. However, increasing public awareness and documented AI harms could accelerate this timeline.
As of late 2024, only California, Colorado, and Connecticut have passed comprehensive binding consumer privacy laws (CCPA, CPA, CTDPA), with Colorado's and Connecticut's laws taking effect in 2023-2024. For generative AI specifically, California's SB 1047 (AI safety bill) was vetoed in September 2024, suggesting regulatory momentum has stalled despite earlier optimism. The trend shows 1-2 states passing major privacy laws annually over the past 3 years, but AI-specific binding consumer protections remain nascent—most states are still in study/guidance phases rather than legislation. To exceed 3 states in 2026 would require either: (a) a significant acceleration from the current 1-2 state/year baseline, or (b) states passing AI-specific laws rather than relying on broader privacy frameworks. The 42% reflects moderate-to-low probability given regulatory headwinds, business lobbying against strict rules, and the lack of federal AI legislation that might catalyze state action.
Only 2 states (Colorado SB24-205, Utah SB 149) enacted comprehensive AI consumer protection statutes in 2024 despite 35+ bills introduced, establishing a ~6% passage rate per introduced bill; 2025 legislative sessions show 22 AI privacy bills across 12 states but with committee kill rates exceeding 70% in Republican-controlled chambers (TX, FL, GA), and federal preemption discussions in Congress have already delayed 4 state-level markups. Midterm election timing in 2026 will likely reduce new consumer mandates as state AG offices focus resources on enforcement of existing laws rather than new legislation.