Crene Logo
Review a thesisExamplesMethodologyData
Crene
Platform
Review a thesisExamples
Data
MethodologyDataAPI documentation
Company
About
Explore
Review one thesisThesis MapsFactorsScenariosDataAbout
Research
MethodologyAPI
Legal
TermsPrivacySupport
© 2026 Crene, Inc.
Back to thesis mapPart ofDoes realized enterprise economic adoption of generative AI materially lag AI infrastructure investment expansion by December 31, 2026?
Event · POLICY & GEOPOLITICS

Will more than 3 US states pass binding generative AI consumer protection laws during 2026?

Resolves Dec 31, 2026
Probability
47%

4-model average

Confidence
LOW

building category history

Stability
—

loading

Models
Diverging

27pt spread

The three supporting readings tell you how much weight to put on the probability: confidence reflects category-level track record, stability tracks how the estimate has moved over time, models shows whether the four agree.

Belief trajectory

Loading belief trajectory...

Per-model probabilities

GPT-4o
65%+18 vs avg

As of 2023, there is increasing momentum for regulations surrounding emerging technologies, particularly generative AI, as evidenced by recent proposals in multiple states. For instance, California and New York have shown intent to introduce legislation addressing AI consumer protections, aligning with the broader trend of tech regulation that followed the revelations of data privacy vulnerabilities over the last few years. Additionally, with 25 states having introduced some form of AI legislation by late 2023, the trend suggests a likelihood of at least 3 states successfully passing binding laws by 2026.

Key uncertaintyThe potential for preemption at the federal level, which could either unify or complicate state-level regulations, may significantly impact the pace of state legislation.
Gemini
45%-2 vs avg

While legislative momentum for AI regulation is growing, evidenced by a surge in proposed bills at both federal and state levels in 2023 and 2024, the actual enactment of *binding consumer protection laws* is a slower process. States like California and New York have introduced significant AI legislation, but these often face lengthy deliberation, amendment, and debate cycles, making the passage of *multiple* binding laws by year-end 2026 challenging. However, increasing public awareness and documented AI harms could accelerate this timeline.

Key uncertaintyThe actual number of states that will successfully navigate the legislative process to enact *binding* consumer protection laws, as opposed to non-binding resolutions or studies, by the end of 2026.
Claude
42%-5 vs avg

As of late 2024, only California, Colorado, and Connecticut have passed comprehensive binding consumer privacy laws (CCPA, CPA, CTDPA), with Colorado's and Connecticut's laws taking effect in 2023-2024. For generative AI specifically, California's SB 1047 (AI safety bill) was vetoed in September 2024, suggesting regulatory momentum has stalled despite earlier optimism. The trend shows 1-2 states passing major privacy laws annually over the past 3 years, but AI-specific binding consumer protections remain nascent—most states are still in study/guidance phases rather than legislation. To exceed 3 states in 2026 would require either: (a) a significant acceleration from the current 1-2 state/year baseline, or (b) states passing AI-specific laws rather than relying on broader privacy frameworks. The 42% reflects moderate-to-low probability given regulatory headwinds, business lobbying against strict rules, and the lack of federal AI legislation that might catalyze state action.

Key uncertaintyWhether a major AI-related incident (deepfakes, discriminatory model deployment, data breach) in 2025 could trigger legislative urgency and compress multiple state timelines into 2026, similar to how data breaches accelerated privacy law adoption.
GrokGrok
38%-9 vs avg

Only 2 states (Colorado SB24-205, Utah SB 149) enacted comprehensive AI consumer protection statutes in 2024 despite 35+ bills introduced, establishing a ~6% passage rate per introduced bill; 2025 legislative sessions show 22 AI privacy bills across 12 states but with committee kill rates exceeding 70% in Republican-controlled chambers (TX, FL, GA), and federal preemption discussions in Congress have already delayed 4 state-level markups. Midterm election timing in 2026 will likely reduce new consumer mandates as state AG offices focus resources on enforcement of existing laws rather than new legislation.

Key uncertaintyWhether Democratic gains in 2025 state legislative elections expand the coalition of states (currently CA, CO, NY, IL) willing to advance AI-specific consumer bills beyond existing data privacy frameworks.
Key disagreementGPT-4o (65%) vs Grok (38%): Different weighting of factors

Resolution criteria

SourceState legislative tracking 2026
CRENE-AIER-C093-20261231Generated Jun 17, 2026