The court found Han guilty of actively fabricating the appearance of a legitimate cabinet meeting to falsely legitimize what it deemed an unconstitutional decree. Han was also convicted of creating false documents, destroying presidential records, and perjury. He retains the right to appeal the court's decision.

Prosecutors had initially sought a 15-year prison sentence for Han. The prosecution's case argued that Han's actions directly undermined the democratic process and contributed to a period of significant political instability. The judge, however, deemed a longer sentence necessary, citing the severity of the charges and the potential damage to the nation's constitutional order.

The case stems from Yoon Suk Yeol's controversial martial law declaration in late 2024, which triggered widespread protests and accusations of authoritarianism. The declaration was ultimately unsuccessful, but it led to investigations into the actions of key government officials, including Han. The legal proceedings against Yoon Suk Yeol are ongoing, with prosecutors seeking the death penalty.

This verdict arrives amidst growing global concerns about the potential for AI-driven disinformation to destabilize democratic institutions. While not directly related to AI, the Han Duck-soo case highlights the fragility of democratic processes and the importance of accountability for those who attempt to subvert them. Experts note that AI-generated deepfakes and sophisticated propaganda campaigns could be used to create false narratives and manipulate public opinion, potentially leading to similar situations in other countries. The development of robust fact-checking mechanisms and media literacy initiatives are considered crucial to mitigating these risks.

The Han Duck-soo verdict is expected to further inflame political tensions in South Korea. The ruling party has criticized the decision as politically motivated, while opposition parties have hailed it as a victory for justice and the rule of law. The appeal process is likely to be lengthy and contentious, and the outcome could have significant implications for the future of South Korean politics.